Are design and test conflicting or symbiotic?
Arif Samad, Synopsys
EEtimes (10/20/2010 2:32 AM EDT)
These days, IC design engineers have more functionality to implement in their designs than ever before, even though design schedules are shrinking. Although design-for-test (DFT) is absolutely necessary to enable thorough and cost-effective manufacturing test, it potentially makes the overall design process even more challenging.
The paradigm of the designer “throwing the design over the wall” to the test engineer was viable in the days when DFT was limited to adding scan chains to a design, and timing delays of the signal propagation across gates were relatively greater than across the interconnects. But the old paradigm no longer applies in an era where advanced DFT methodologies are necessary to limit test cost, interconnect delays are dominant and power consumption critical.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flexible Pixel Processor Video IP
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- MIPI SWI3S Manager Core IP
- Ultra-low power high dynamic range image sensor
- Neural Video Processor IP
Related White Papers
- SoCs lend momentum to design-for-test solutions
- SOC: Submicron Issues -> Physics dictates priority: design-for-test
- DFT – IP Reuse & SoC
- DFT for SoC : The Economic Myths
Latest White Papers
- Enabling Space-Grade AI/ML with RISC-V: A Fully European Stack for Autonomous Missions
- CANDoSA: A Hardware Performance Counter-Based Intrusion Detection System for DoS Attacks on Automotive CAN bus
- How Next-Gen Chips Are Unlocking RISC-V’s Customization Advantage
- Efficient Hardware-Assisted Heap Memory Safety for Embedded RISC-V Systems
- Automatically Retargeting Hardware and Code Generation for RISC-V Custom Instructions