Formal property verification: A tale of two methods
David Vincenzoni, STMicroelectronics
EDN (January 15, 2018)
The Formal Property Verification (FPV) methodology often gets used in the last step of verification flow, after much time spent building a complex random constrained UVM (Universal Verification Methodology) environment where some corner cases are still not covered.
Other times, FPV is used when a silicon bug is found that was not raised during the dynamic verification phase.
In a wisely applied verification flow, FPV should be used in the first phase, as soon as the RTL (Register Transfer Logic) code is available.
Here we look at two examples of verification flow:
- A digital block verified through a UVM test bench
- Then, first verified using FPV flow.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Manager IP
- eDP 2.0 Verification IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
Related White Papers
- Don't over-constrain in formal property verification (FPV) flows
- Formal, simulation, and AMBA verification IP combine to verify configurable powerline networking SoC
- How formal verification saves time in digital IP design
- Formal Verification Has It Covered!
Latest White Papers
- Attack on a PUF-based Secure Binary Neural Network
- BBOPlace-Bench: Benchmarking Black-Box Optimization for Chip Placement
- FD-SOI: A Cyber-Resilient Substrate Against Laser Fault Injection—The Future Platform for Secure Automotive Electronics
- In-DRAM True Random Number Generation Using Simultaneous Multiple-Row Activation: An Experimental Study of Real DRAM Chips
- SPAD: Specialized Prefill and Decode Hardware for Disaggregated LLM Inference