Judge interprets ARM's patent claims
Judge interprets ARM's patent claims
By EE Times
June 22, 2001 (7:43 p.m. EST)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010622S0100
SAN MATEO, Calif. A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled on the definitions of microprocessor patent claims made by ARM Ltd. as part of the company's litigation against rival PicoTurbo Inc. At issue are seven patents, four covering hardware that allow different instruction set bit widths, two that cover exceptions and one that describes a multiplier-accumulator. Following the preliminary "Markman" hearing held April 6, Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif., interpreted the terms and phrases of claims made in the ARM patents that the two companies had disputed. The judge did not rule on the validity of the patents. In a story posted on our Web site Wednesday (June 20), we incorrectly reported that Judge Wilken threw out ARM's patent claims against PicoTurbo Inc. We regret the error.
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- SHA-256 Secure Hash Algorithm IP Core
Related News
- UPDATED: Judge dismisses all Rambus claims against Infineon
- Judge Again Dismisses Rambus Patent Claims in Virginia Case
- IFI CLAIMS Announces 2017 Top U.S. Patent Recipients
- IFI CLAIMS Announces 2018's Top U.S. Patent Recipients
Latest News
- Alchip Appoints Freddy Engineer Chief Business Officer and North America General Manager
- Perceptia Devices and Dolphin Semiconductor Partner to Deliver Best-in-Class IP Portfolio Covering Power Management, Clocking, High-Quality Audio and In-Situ Monitoring
- TSMC Chases Soaring AI Demand
- EU DARE Project Is Scrambling to Replace Codasip
- Sofics and Alcyon Photonics Partner to Support Next-Generation Photonic Systems