Judge interprets ARM's patent claims
Judge interprets ARM's patent claims
By EE Times
June 22, 2001 (7:43 p.m. EST)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010622S0100
SAN MATEO, Calif. A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled on the definitions of microprocessor patent claims made by ARM Ltd. as part of the company's litigation against rival PicoTurbo Inc. At issue are seven patents, four covering hardware that allow different instruction set bit widths, two that cover exceptions and one that describes a multiplier-accumulator. Following the preliminary "Markman" hearing held April 6, Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif., interpreted the terms and phrases of claims made in the ARM patents that the two companies had disputed. The judge did not rule on the validity of the patents. In a story posted on our Web site Wednesday (June 20), we incorrectly reported that Judge Wilken threw out ARM's patent claims against PicoTurbo Inc. We regret the error.
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- AGILEX 7 R-Tile Gen5 NVMe Host IP
- 100G PAM4 Serdes PHY - 14nm
- Bluetooth Low Energy Subsystem IP
- Multi-core capable 64-bit RISC-V CPU with vector extensions
Related News
- UPDATED: Judge dismisses all Rambus claims against Infineon
- Judge Again Dismisses Rambus Patent Claims in Virginia Case
- IFI CLAIMS Announces 2017 Top U.S. Patent Recipients
- IFI CLAIMS Announces 2018's Top U.S. Patent Recipients
Latest News
- IntoPIX & Altera Unlock New Levels Of Efficiency For JPEG XS On Agilex At IBC 2025
- Perceptia Begins Port of pPLL03 to Samsung 8nm Process Technology
- Efinix® Doubles Titanium Product Line
- SmartSoC Solutions Partners with Cortus to Advance Chip Design and Manufacturing for SIM Cards, Smart Cards, Banking Cards, and E-Passports in India
- Fraunhofer IIS and ARRI announce partnership for post-production workflows at IBC 2025