Judge interprets ARM's patent claims
Judge interprets ARM's patent claims
By EE Times
June 22, 2001 (7:43 p.m. EST)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010622S0100
SAN MATEO, Calif. A U.S. District Court judge recently ruled on the definitions of microprocessor patent claims made by ARM Ltd. as part of the company's litigation against rival PicoTurbo Inc. At issue are seven patents, four covering hardware that allow different instruction set bit widths, two that cover exceptions and one that describes a multiplier-accumulator. Following the preliminary "Markman" hearing held April 6, Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif., interpreted the terms and phrases of claims made in the ARM patents that the two companies had disputed. The judge did not rule on the validity of the patents. In a story posted on our Web site Wednesday (June 20), we incorrectly reported that Judge Wilken threw out ARM's patent claims against PicoTurbo Inc. We regret the error.
Related Semiconductor IP
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- SM4 Cipher Engine
- Ultra-High-Speed Time-Interleaved 7-bit 64GSPS ADC on 3nm
- Fault Tolerant DDR2/DDR3/DDR4 Memory controller
Related News
- UPDATED: Judge dismisses all Rambus claims against Infineon
- Judge Again Dismisses Rambus Patent Claims in Virginia Case
- IFI CLAIMS Announces 2017 Top U.S. Patent Recipients
- IFI CLAIMS Announces 2018's Top U.S. Patent Recipients
Latest News
- Comment: Meta Reportedly Acquired Rivos. NIC Company Next?
- Cassia Proposes ‘Better Math’ for AI Efficiency
- QuickLogic Announces $1M eFPGA Hard IP Contract for Data Center ASIC
- Creonic Updates Doppler Channel IP Core with Extended Frequency Band and Sampling Range
- TSMC Price Hikes End the Era of Cheap Transistors