What does the Lattice rejection mean for chip M&A?
Although the rejection of the Lattice deal was expected, it none the less has an impact on a number of dynamics in the chip industry and further M&A and consolidation. Freezing out China removes a "catalyst" in the market which help bid up values and add fear to both potential targets or those left out. Cross border deals are obviously more difficult to get done and even small deals with China will likely be put under a microscope now.
The Xcerra deal is likely very safe given the size and lack of critical technology. Much like the Mattson deal before it, China will only be allowed to acquire second or third tier small chip companies with no unique technology or critical market position.
Does this slow down China's chip ambitions?
Does this slow down M&A and consolidation further?
Does this negatively impact future sales of equipment to China?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- CRYSTALS Dilithium core for accelerating NIST FIPS 204 Module Lattice Digital Signature algorithm
- High-speed, high-throughput, lattice PQC cryptographic subsystem
- Lattice Mico8 Open, Free Soft Microcontroller
- Lattice-based Post-Quantum Cryptography Processing Engine
- LatticeMico32 Open, Free 32-Bit Soft Processor
Related Blogs
- What Does Fab-Lite Mean?
- What does Cadence mean when it calls System Realization a "holistic" approach to IC design?
- What does Amazon's multiday cloud outage mean for EDA cloud services?
- What Does SystemC Mean for Design and Verification?
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility