TSMC versus Intel at 20nm!
The biggest news out of the TSMC Symposium last week was the 20nm update. Lots of debate and speculation, just why is TSMC releasing one version of 20nm (20nm SoC) versus multiple versions like in 40nm (LP, G, LPG) and 28nm (HP, HPM, HPL, LP)? Here are my thoughts, I would also be interested in your feedback in the comment section. This really is a big change for both TSMC and the foundry business so it is certainly worth discussing.
Morris Chang did a candid interview in early January discussing Intel as a competitor. Morris is a very clever man, a master at the card game bridge, so you can really read a lot into of what he has said here:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB 2.0 femtoPHY -TSMC N6 18 x1, OTG, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- USB 2.0 femtoPHY - TSMC N5 12 x1, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- USB 2.0 femtoPHY - TSMC N3P 1.2V x1, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
- USB 2.0 picoPHY - TSMC 90LPFS33 x1, OTG
- USB 2.0 femtoPHY - TSMC 7FF18 x1, OTG, North/South (vertical) poly orientation
Related Blogs
- Intel Versus TSMC 14nm Processes
- IEDM 2017 - Intel Versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES at the Leading Edge
- TSMC To Tape-Out 20nm Apple Processor This Month
- Altera, Intel, TSMC, ARM: the Plot Thickens
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Announces Industry's First Verification IP for Embedded USB2v2 (eUSB2v2)
- The Industry’s First USB4 Device IP Certification Will Speed Innovation and Edge AI Enablement
- Understanding Extended Metadata in CXL 3.1: What It Means for Your Systems
- 2025 Outlook with Mahesh Tirupattur of Analog Bits
- eUSB2 Version 2 with 4.8Gbps and the Use Cases: A Comprehensive Overview