TSMC versus Intel at 20nm!
April 25, 2012
The biggest news out of the TSMC Symposium last week was the 20nm update. Lots of debate and speculation, just why is TSMC releasing one version of 20nm (20nm SoC) versus multiple versions like in 40nm (LP, G, LPG) and 28nm (HP, HPM, HPL, LP)? Here are my thoughts, I would also be interested in your feedback in the comment section. This really is a big change for both TSMC and the foundry business so it is certainly worth discussing.
Morris Chang did a candid interview in early January discussing Intel as a competitor. Morris is a very clever man, a master at the card game bridge, so you can really read a lot into of what he has said here:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- 25MHz to 4.0GHz Fractional-N RC PLL Synthesizer on TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 4.0 V2 PHY - 4TX/2RX, TSMC N3P , North/South Poly Orientation
- TSMC CLN5FF GUCIe LP Die-to-Die PHY
- Flipchip 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with ESD-hardened GPIOs in TSMC 12nm FFC/FFC+
Related Blogs
- Intel Versus TSMC 14nm Processes
- IEDM 2017 - Intel Versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES at the Leading Edge
- NVIDIA Claims TSMC 20nm will not Scale?
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
Latest Blogs
- A Comparison on Different AMBA 5 CHI Verification IPs
- Cadence Recognized as TSMC OIP Partner of the Year at 2025 OIP Ecosystem Forum
- Accelerating Development Cycles and Scalable, High-Performance On-Device AI with New Arm Lumex CSS Platform
- Desktop-Quality Ray-Traced Gaming and Intelligent AI Performance on Mobile with New Arm Mali G1-Ultra GPU
- Powering Scale Up and Scale Out with 224G SerDes for UALink and Ultra Ethernet