TSMC versus Intel at 20nm!
The biggest news out of the TSMC Symposium last week was the 20nm update. Lots of debate and speculation, just why is TSMC releasing one version of 20nm (20nm SoC) versus multiple versions like in 40nm (LP, G, LPG) and 28nm (HP, HPM, HPL, LP)? Here are my thoughts, I would also be interested in your feedback in the comment section. This really is a big change for both TSMC and the foundry business so it is certainly worth discussing.
Morris Chang did a candid interview in early January discussing Intel as a competitor. Morris is a very clever man, a master at the card game bridge, so you can really read a lot into of what he has said here:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC CLN3FFP HBM4 PHY
- Wi-Fi 7(be) RF Transceiver IP in TSMC 22nm
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with 5V ODIO & Analog in TSMC 16nm
- HBM3 PHY V2 (Hard) - TSMC N3P
- USB4 Gen3 x2-lane PHY, TSMC N5, 1.2V, N/S orientation, type-C
Related Blogs
- Intel Versus TSMC 14nm Processes
- IEDM 2017 - Intel Versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES at the Leading Edge
- NVIDIA Claims TSMC 20nm will not Scale?
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility