NVIDIA Claims TSMC 20nm will not Scale?
Interesting article from Joel Hruska on ExtremeTech: Nvidia deeply unhappy with TSMC, claims 22nm essentially worthless . The title is a bit dramatic (poetic license) but the charts are accurate to the degree that 20nm costs will be significantly higher from the start and will continue to be higher throughout production and maturity.
One reason is double patterning, which is required at 20nm (double patterning splits a design into separate masks when devices are too close together). If 28nm masks cost $3M, 20nm masks will cost $5M or more. Another reason is design complexity: layout dependent effects (LDE) and process variation will get worse at 20nm, simulation and verification requirements will explode, and the list goes on…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- 25MHz to 4.0GHz Fractional-N RC PLL Synthesizer on TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 4.0 V2 PHY - 4TX/2RX, TSMC N3P , North/South Poly Orientation
- TSMC CLN5FF GUCIe LP Die-to-Die PHY
- Flipchip 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with ESD-hardened GPIOs in TSMC 12nm FFC/FFC+
Related Blogs
- Samsung 20nm test chip includes ARM Cortex-M0 processor core. How many will fit on the head of a pin?
- Intel will NOT build ARM chips!
- TSMC versus Intel at 20nm!
- Apple Will NOT Manufacture SoCs at Intel
Latest Blogs
- From GPUs to Memory Pools: Why AI Needs Compute Express Link (CXL)
- Verification of UALink (UAL) and Ultra Ethernet (UEC) Protocols for Scalable HPC/AI Networks using Synopsys VIP
- Enhancing PCIe6.0 Performance: Flit Sequence Numbers and Selective NAK Explained
- Smarter ASICs and SoCs: Unlocking Real-World Connectivity with eFPGA and Data Converters
- RISC-V Takes First Step Toward International Standardization as ISO/IEC JTC1 Grants PAS Submitter Status