NVIDIA Claims TSMC 20nm will not Scale?
Interesting article from Joel Hruska on ExtremeTech: Nvidia deeply unhappy with TSMC, claims 22nm essentially worthless . The title is a bit dramatic (poetic license) but the charts are accurate to the degree that 20nm costs will be significantly higher from the start and will continue to be higher throughout production and maturity.
One reason is double patterning, which is required at 20nm (double patterning splits a design into separate masks when devices are too close together). If 28nm masks cost $3M, 20nm masks will cost $5M or more. Another reason is design complexity: layout dependent effects (LDE) and process variation will get worse at 20nm, simulation and verification requirements will explode, and the list goes on…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC CLN3FFP HBM4 PHY
- Wi-Fi 7(be) RF Transceiver IP in TSMC 22nm
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with 5V ODIO & Analog in TSMC 16nm
- HBM3 PHY V2 (Hard) - TSMC N3P
- USB4 Gen3 x2-lane PHY, TSMC N5, 1.2V, N/S orientation, type-C
Related Blogs
- Samsung 20nm test chip includes ARM Cortex-M0 processor core. How many will fit on the head of a pin?
- TSMC absolutely did NOT halt 28nm production!
- Intel will NOT build ARM chips!
- TSMC versus Intel at 20nm!
Latest Blogs
- lowRISC Tackles Post-Quantum Cryptography Challenges through Research Collaborations
- How to Solve the Size, Weight, Power and Cooling Challenge in Radar & Radio Frequency Modulation Classification
- Programmable Hardware Delivers 10,000X Improvement in Verification Speed over Software for Forward Error Correction
- The Integrated Design Challenge: Developing Chip, Software, and System in Unison
- Introducing Mi-V RV32 v4.0 Soft Processor: Enhanced RISC-V Power