Second Source The x86? No Thanks
October 6, 2014
There was a time when Intel couldn’t give away rights to make the x86. National Semiconductor turned down the offer to second source the processor.
“I was on a skiing vacation with my family when I got a telephone call from Andy Grove at Intel,” recalls Charlie Sporck, CEO of National, in his book SPINOFF, “Andy said microprocessor sales were so strong that Intel needed a second source.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UFS 5.0 Host Controller IP
- PDM Receiver/PDM-to-PCM Converter
- Voltage and Temperature Sensor with integrated ADC - GlobalFoundries® 22FDX®
- 8MHz / 40MHz Pierce Oscillator - X-FAB XT018-0.18µm
- UCIe RX Interface
Related Blogs
- UMC Wins Qualcomm 28nm Second Source Contract!
- Sun's x86 Clone
- Source of IP: Silicon foundries provides 18% of Design IP blocks, IP vendors only 16% to Fabless
- Jeff Bier's Impulse Response - Open Source Digital Signal Processing?
Latest Blogs
- Satellite communications are no longer as secure as assumed
- Why Hardware Monitoring Needs Infrastructure, Not Just Sensors
- Why Post-Quantum Cryptography Doesn’t Replace Classical Cryptography
- The Silent Guardian of AI Compute - PUFrt Unifies Hardware Security and Memory Repair to Build the Trust Foundation for AI Factories
- Heterogeneous NPU Data Movement Tax: Intel's Own Slides Tell the Story