Protecting die-2-die interfaces...
There are several reasons to combine various chiplets in a single package, either next to each other (2.5D) or stacked on top of each other (3D) like the memory cube depicted below.
Example of a 3D stacked, co-packaged assembly. 4 layers of DRAM memory are stacked on top of a logic layer. Many of the interfaces between the logic layer and the memory devices stay within the package.
For instance, it enables chip designers to select the most optimal process for each type of function (interface, memory, compute, FPGA, analog circuits, MEMS, optical, …). It also allows to create chips with larger gate count when the reticle size is the limiting factor. And of course, yield improves a lot when the area of the die is reduced.
At Sofics we get a lot of questions about the required ESD robustness for the die-2-die (D2D) interfaces between chiplets in a package. People wonder how to select the right ESD standard (HBM, MM, CDM, TLP – more info) and what robustness level (1kV HBM?) they need to design for. Furthermore people wonder how they can validate the robustness once ESD devices are integrated?
What is the right ESD standard and ESD robustness level?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flexible Pixel Processor Video IP
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- Ultra-low power high dynamic range image sensor
- Neural Video Processor IP
- Flash Memory LDPC Decoder IP Core
Related Blogs
- SSD Interfaces and Performance Effects
- Protecting Against IP Theft
- On-chip interfaces gain importance in next-gen FPGAs
- Verifying MIPI interfaces in SoCs
Latest Blogs
- What It Will Take to Build a Resilient Automotive Compute Ecosystem
- The Blind Spot of Semiconductor IP Sales
- Scalable I/O Virtualization: A Deep Dive into PCIe’s Next Gen Virtualization
- UEC-LLR: The Future of Loss Recovery in Ethernet for AI and HPC
- Trust at the Core: A Deep Dive into Hardware Root of Trust (HRoT)