IP Integration : What is the difference between stitching and weaving?
As a hardware design engineer, I was never comfortable when someone talked about IP integration as ‘stitching a chip together’. First of all, it sounded like a painful process involving sharp needles, usually preceded by a painful accident. I happened to be the recipient of said stitches when, at 8 years of age, I contested a stairs post with my forehead, and sorely lost. I have to say, luckily, I have been quite adept at avoiding the needle and thread ever since. That was of course until once when, an hour before that important customer presentation, my top-shirt button, due to an over enthusiastic yawn, pinged across my hotel room floor like a nano-UFO. A panicked retrieval of the renegade button was followed quickly with a successful hunt for an elusive emergency sewing-kit. The crisis quickly dissipated as I stitched back the button in a random-but-directed type of methodology. Needle-less to say stitching, whilst sometimes necessary, makes me uncomfortable.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Multi-channel Ultra Ethernet TSS Transform Engine
- Configurable CPU tailored precisely to your needs
- Ultra high-performance low-power ADC
- HiFi iQ DSP
- CXL 4 Verification IP
Related Blogs
- I3C IP: Enabling Efficient Communication and Sensor Integration
- Advanced SoC Development Uses Next-Gen IP Integration Tools
- Efficient IP Packaging for Today’s SoC Integration
- IP integration: Is it the real system-level design?
Latest Blogs
- AI is stress-testing processor architectures and RISC-V fits the moment
- Rambus Announces Industry-Leading Ultra Ethernet Security IP Solutions for AI and HPC
- The Memory Imperative for Next-Generation AI Accelerator SoCs
- Leadership in CAN XL strengthens Bosch’s position in vehicle communication
- Validating UPLI Protocol Across Topologies with Cadence UALink VIP