Evaluating EDA Functional Safety in the AV Era
In the EDA industry, a fierce battle is underway around functional safety. Surprisingly, though, the "big three" EDA houses maintain quite distinct approaches to helping chipmakers prove ISO 26262 compliance.
As cars continue their transformation from glorified, mechanical horseless carriages to AI-powered robots on wheels, the global auto industry is increasingly looking to the semiconductor market to provide the embedded intelligence necessary to realize the era of assisted and autonomous driving. Meanwhile, the auto industry’s long-running obsession with reliability and functional safety continues unabated.
The “north star” for establishing the reliability of E/E automotive systems is ISO 26262, the international standard for functional safety of electrical and/or electronic systems in production automobiles. Automakers and their Tier 1 suppliers are pushing semiconductor providers to deliver ISO-26262-compliant ICs together with evidence that the tools used to create the chips have qualified for the standards as well.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- ISO26262 ASIL-B/D Compliant 32-bit RISC-V Core
- CAN 2.0, CAN FD - Developed as ISO26262-10 Safety Element out of Context (ISO26262 soft IP SEooC, ASIL-B ready design)
Related Blogs
- Functional safety in the automotive supply chain
- Wind River and Arm collaboration accelerates journey to functional safety compliance in centralized vehicle controllers
- Winning Embedded World Best in Show for RISC-V Functional Safety Processor
- EDA 'co-opertition' - a new era or more lip service?
Latest Blogs
- The Growing Importance of PVT Monitoring for Silicon Lifecycle Management
- Unlock early software development for custom RISC-V designs with faster simulation
- HBM4 Boosts Memory Performance for AI Training
- Using AI to Accelerate Chip Design: Dynamic, Adaptive Flows
- Locking When Emulating Xtensa LX Multi-Core on a Xilinx FPGA