An Elephant on a Diet
I was recently reminded of Jen-Hsun Huang’s comments on the Atom processor’s prospects for use in mobile applications. As reported in Laptop Magazine, Jen-Hsun said, “You could give an elephant a diet, but it’s still an elephant.” Although Jen-Hsun was commenting on the prospects for Intel’s Moorestown version of Atom in mobile SOCs, the same comments apply to most embedded applications where Paul Otellini, Intel’s CEO, has recently said Moorestown will play.
Take Smart TVs for instance, where Intel has been pushing the Atom-based CE4100 as the future of the connected TV. Although touted as cost-effective and low power, the Atom CPU used in the 4100 is fully 3 times larger in terms of silicon real estate versus MIPS’ latest fully synthesizable high end core—the 1074K Coherent Processing System (CPS). And the 1074K delivers nearly 2.5x the performance compared to Atom. Perhaps the most interesting thing is that for this application, Intel, the perceived processor ‘King’, actually provides less performance per square millimeter of silicon, or per miliwatt of power, than MIPS.
Related Semiconductor IP
- SoC Security Platform / Hardware Root of Trust
- SPI to AHB-Lite Bridge
- Octal SPI Master/Slave Controller
- I2C and SPI Master/Slave Controller
- AHB/AXI4-Lite to AXI4-Stream Bridge
Related Blogs
- Separating Fact from Fiction: The Impact of Android Anti-fragmentation on the Processor Landscape
- Altera Licenses MIPS32 Processor Architecture
- Commodity processor IP !?!
- TSMC Could Make Half Of Intel's Atom Output