Separating Fact from Fiction: The Impact of Android Anti-fragmentation on the Processor Landscape
April 1, 2011
Rumors, misinformation and speculation are spreading like wildfire across the industry today following recent reports about Android anti-fragmentation efforts and what this means for processor architecture openness. Will Google’s anti-fragmentation initiatives for Android code impact providers of microprocessor architectures such as MIPS, Intel and ARM? Does anti-fragmentation mean that Google is standardizing Android for any specific architecture? As someone who has been deeply involved with MIPS’ Android efforts, here’s my take on separating some of the fact from fiction.
Related Semiconductor IP
- Rad-Hard GPIO, ODIO & LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 1.22V/1uA Reference voltage and current source
- 1.2V SLVS Transceiver in UMC 110nm
- Neuromorphic Processor IP
- Lossless & Lossy Frame Compression IP
Related Blogs
- Android Outsells iPhones, Opens Processor Market
- Navigating the Future of EDA: The Transformative Impact of AI and ML
- Enhancing Edge AI with the Newest Class of Processor: Tensilica NeuroEdge 130 AICP
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
Latest Blogs
- MIPS P8700 RISC-V Processor for Advanced Functional Safety Systems
- Boost SoC Flexibility: 4 Design Tips for Memory Subsystems with Combo DDR3/4 Interfaces
- High Bandwidth Memory Evolution from First Generation HBM to the Latest HBM4
- Keeping Pace with CXL Specification Revisions
- Silicon-proven LVTS for 2nm: a new era of accuracy and integration in thermal monitoring