Separating Fact from Fiction: The Impact of Android Anti-fragmentation on the Processor Landscape
April 1, 2011
Rumors, misinformation and speculation are spreading like wildfire across the industry today following recent reports about Android anti-fragmentation efforts and what this means for processor architecture openness. Will Google’s anti-fragmentation initiatives for Android code impact providers of microprocessor architectures such as MIPS, Intel and ARM? Does anti-fragmentation mean that Google is standardizing Android for any specific architecture? As someone who has been deeply involved with MIPS’ Android efforts, here’s my take on separating some of the fact from fiction.
Related Semiconductor IP
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O library with ODIO and 5V HPD in TSMC 16nm
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with ODIO and 5V HPD in TSMC 12nm
- 1.8V to 5V GPIO, 1.8V to 5V Analog in TSMC 180nm BCD
- 1.8V/3.3V GPIO Library with HDMI, Aanlog & LVDS Cells in TSMC 22nm
- Specialed 20V Analog I/O in TSMC 55nm
Related Blogs
- Android Outsells iPhones, Opens Processor Market
- RISC-V's Impact on Processor IP Licensing Fees
- Exploring USB Applications and the Impact of USB IP
- Navigating the Future of EDA: The Transformative Impact of AI and ML
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Unveils the Industry’s First eUSB2V2 IP Solutions
- Half of the Compute Shipped to Top Hyperscalers in 2025 will be Arm-based
- Industry's First Verification IP for Display Port Automotive Extensions (DP AE)
- IMG DXT GPU: A Game-Changer for Gaming Smartphones
- Rivos and Canonical partner to deliver scalable RISC-V solutions in Data Centers and enable an enterprise-grade Ubuntu experience across Rivos platforms