Formal property verification: A tale of two methods
David Vincenzoni, STMicroelectronics
EDN (January 15, 2018)
The Formal Property Verification (FPV) methodology often gets used in the last step of verification flow, after much time spent building a complex random constrained UVM (Universal Verification Methodology) environment where some corner cases are still not covered.
Other times, FPV is used when a silicon bug is found that was not raised during the dynamic verification phase.
In a wisely applied verification flow, FPV should be used in the first phase, as soon as the RTL (Register Transfer Logic) code is available.
Here we look at two examples of verification flow:
- A digital block verified through a UVM test bench
- Then, first verified using FPV flow.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- ML-KEM Key Encapsulation & ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
Related Articles
- Don't over-constrain in formal property verification (FPV) flows
- Formal, simulation, and AMBA verification IP combine to verify configurable powerline networking SoC
- How formal verification saves time in digital IP design
- Formal Verification Has It Covered!
Latest Articles
- FPGA-Accelerated RISC-V ISA Extensions for Efficient Neural Network Inference on Edge Devices
- MultiVic: A Time-Predictable RISC-V Multi-Core Processor Optimized for Neural Network Inference
- AnaFlow: Agentic LLM-based Workflow for Reasoning-Driven Explainable and Sample-Efficient Analog Circuit Sizing
- FeNN-DMA: A RISC-V SoC for SNN acceleration
- Multimodal Chip Physical Design Engineer Assistant