HW/SW co-verification basics: Part 3 - Hardware-centric methods
Jason Andrews
EETimes (5/24/2011 1:43 PM EDT)
As we have seen in Part 1 and Part 2, there are benefits and drawbacks of using software models of microprocessors and other hardware. This section discusses techniques that avoid model creation issues by using a representation of the microprocessor that doesn't depend on an engineer coding a model of its behavior.
As the world of SoC design has evolved, the design flows used for microprocessor and DSP IP have changed. In the beginning, most IP for critical blocks such as the embedded microprocessor were in the form of hard IP. The company creating the IP wanted to make sure the user realized the maximum benefit in terms of optimized performance and area. The hard macro also allows the IP to be used without revealing all of the source code of the design. As an example, most of the ARM7TDMI designs use a hard macro licensed from ARM.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- RVA23, Multi-cluster, Hypervisor and Android
- 64 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 2048-bit VLEN and AMM
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- V-by-One® HS plus Tx/Rx IP
- MSP7-32 MACsec IP core for FPGA or ASIC
Related White Papers
- HW/SW co-verification basics: Part 2 - Software-centric methods
- Transaction-based methodology supports HW/SW co-verification
- Approaches to accelerated HW/SW co-verification
- HW/SW co-verification basics: Part 1 - Determining what & how to verify
Latest White Papers
- Concealable physical unclonable functions using vertical NAND flash memory
- Ramping Up Open-Source RISC-V Cores: Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Superscalar, Out-of-Order Execution
- Transition Fixes in 3nm Multi-Voltage SoC Design
- CXL Topology-Aware and Expander-Driven Prefetching: Unlocking SSD Performance
- Breaking the Memory Bandwidth Boundary. GDDR7 IP Design Challenges & Solutions