(Re)Shoring Up Semiconductor Manufacturing
By Don Scansen, EETimes (March 22, 2021)
Sometimes history can be difficult to decipher. But the reasons why manufacturing moved out of the United States are blatantly obvious — cheap labor and reduced regulation.
Even though the analysis might be easy, history can still be difficult once those old mistakes start becoming clearer.
Sometimes recovering from mistakes is not possible. Will US domestic semiconductor manufacturing recover in a meaningful way? What factors might drive that success story?
Answering those questions seems a little ambitious, even for a blog post, but let’s attempt a few.
What’s changing?
Offshoring’s main selling point always was and is reduced labor costs. But as those cheap labor pools become upwardly mobile, demands for better living standards tended to exert increasing pressure on the original planning calculations.
Some jurisdictions, particularly while in the developing phase, offer relaxed regulations. But as countries become more affluent, they naturally want to take better care of their own backyard. Whether through government regulation or corporate ethics, increasing respect for the natural environment starts to cost more.
As semiconductor manufacturing plant costs move into eleven figure range, it is not a simple case of just moving to the latest frontier of cheap labor. The Chinese experience in wafer foundries is proof of that. Then there are bureaucratic challenges to setting up in China along with known risks to intellectual property.
Offshoring calculations are changing. The Chinese labor rate gap is closing. Thanks to explosive Chinese economic growth, real wages have increased by a factor of eight for urban Chinese (since 2000 as reported in Forbes). The balance is clearly shifting.
My view is that offshoring was quickly rationalized by viewing certain technologies as commodities. High volume components for the consumer market is not a matter of national security. Surely a DRAM mega fab or a custom foundry cranking out massive volumes of cheap computer chipsets or even modern cell phone processors is not strategic
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HiFi iQ DSP
- CXL 4 Verification IP
- JESD204E Controller IP
- eUSB2V2.0 Controller + PHY IP
- I/O Library with LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
Related News
- Global Semiconductor Sales Increase 18.8% in Q1 2025 Compared to Q1 2024; March 2025 Sales up 1.8% Month-to-Month
- Qualitas Semiconductor Successfully Develops UCIe v2.0-Compliant PHY IP, Enabling Up to 512Gbps Die-to-Die Connectivity
- Alphacore is gearing up for a high-impact presence at the 2025 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages & Parts Management Consortium
- SkyWater Technology Expands Leadership in U.S. Semiconductor Manufacturing with Infineon IP License Agreement
Latest News
- SkyeChip’s UCIe 3.0 Advanced Package PHY IP for SF4X Listed on Samsung Foundry CONNECT
- Victor Peng Joins Rambus Board of Directors
- Arteris Announces Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 and Estimated First Quarter and Full Year 2026 Guidance
- Arteris Network-on-Chip Technology Achieves Deployment Milestone of 4 Billion Chips and Chiplets
- RISC-V Pivots from Academia to Industrial Heavyweight