Letter to the editor: IP model a mess (Timothy Llewellynn, Anagram Technologies)
I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Opinion: Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
I'd like to comment on your recent ''Semi IP sector is a lost cause'' article. I agree with your comments but there is more to the story and more importantly why is it difficult to make money in semi IP?
If you look at IP it has a nice story. Moore's Law creates the designer productivity gap and drives a need to license in order to build new products. This can be seen in a 15-25 percent CAGR over the last 10 years. Secondly if you amortize IP development costs over many licensees, the price to access specific technologies is greatly reduced, spurring innovative new applications and designs.
So then why is selling IP like selling dog food at the movie theatre?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
- 10-bit Pipeline ADC - Tower 180 nm
- Simulation VIP for Ethernet UEC
- CAN-FD Controller
- Bluetooth® Low Energy 6.2 PHY IP with Channel Sounding
Related News
- Letter to the editor: Patents a sore spot (Tuan Pham, EM Microelectronic Marin)
- Letter to the editor: IP pros, cons (Jonah Probell)
- Letter to the editor: Golf more fun than IP (Doug McKenney, LSI)
- Letter to the editor: DSPs for IP (Shaul Berger)
Latest News
- WAVE-N v2: Chips&Media’s Custom NPU Retains 16-bit FP for Superior Efficiency at High TOPS
- Quintauris releases RT-Europa, the first RISC-V Real-Time Platform for Automotive
- PQShield's PQCryptoLib-Core v1.0.2 Achieves CAVP Certification for a broad set of classical and post-quantum algorithms
- M31 Debuts at ICCAD 2025, Empowering the Next Generation of AI Chips with High-Performance, Low-Power IP
- Perceptia Begins Port of pPLL03 to Samsung 14nm Process Technology