Letter to the editor: Foundry vs. IP (Les Wilson)
I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Opinion: Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
I agree that the silicon IP market is in a tragic state. I think the often cited quality issue is an out of date stereotype. I have witnessed plenty of high quality IPs.
The fundamentals of a business are in question here. Why are no new SIP companies forming? They cannot make a profit. The customers tend to think they are just hiring labor with no value add so they negotiate the IP company down to zero profit.
Only microprocessor core companies have leverage at this point, because they have established a brand (ARM, MIPS etc.) Most IP companies cannot charge a royalty so profit is pretty thin.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
- 10-bit Pipeline ADC - Tower 180 nm
- Simulation VIP for Ethernet UEC
- CAN-FD Controller
- Bluetooth® Low Energy 6.2 PHY IP with Channel Sounding
Related News
- Letter to the editor: Patents a sore spot (Tuan Pham, EM Microelectronic Marin)
- Letter to the editor: IP pros, cons (Jonah Probell)
- Letter to the editor: Golf more fun than IP (Doug McKenney, LSI)
- Letter to the editor: DSPs for IP (Shaul Berger)
Latest News
- WAVE-N v2: Chips&Media’s Custom NPU Retains 16-bit FP for Superior Efficiency at High TOPS
- Quintauris releases RT-Europa, the first RISC-V Real-Time Platform for Automotive
- PQShield's PQCryptoLib-Core v1.0.2 Achieves CAVP Certification for a broad set of classical and post-quantum algorithms
- M31 Debuts at ICCAD 2025, Empowering the Next Generation of AI Chips with High-Performance, Low-Power IP
- Perceptia Begins Port of pPLL03 to Samsung 14nm Process Technology