Why Did EDA Have a Hardware Business Model?
Business models are really important. Just ask any internet startup company that has lots of users and is trying to work out how to monetize them. It is a lot easier to get people to use something for free, much harder to get people to pay for something, especially when they don't value it much. Different companies that look somewhat similar often have very different business models.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- HBM4 PHY IP
- Ultra-Low-Power LPDDR3/LPDDR2/DDR3L Combo Subsystem
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
- HBM4 Controller IP
- IPSEC AES-256-GCM (Standalone IPsec)
Related Blogs
- Business Models: EDA Is Software But It Used To Be Sold As Hardware
- EDA / IP Business Model Debate: Daniel Nenni versus Aart de Geus
- Why did Mentor Acquire Tanner EDA?
- Taiwan Trip Report: Semiconductors, EDA, and the ASIC Business!
Latest Blogs
- ReRAM in Automotive SoCs: When Every Nanosecond Counts
- AndeSentry – Andes’ Security Platform
- Formally verifying AVX2 rejection sampling for ML-KEM
- Integrating PQC into StrongSwan: ML-KEM integration for IPsec/IKEv2
- Breaking the Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Celestial AI’s Photonic Fabric™ with Custom ESD IP on TSMC’s 5nm Platform