EDA / IP Business Model Debate: Daniel Nenni versus Aart de Geus
First, lets review the business model transitions EDA has seen. We started with perpetual licensing which is a software license for the life of the product. EDA companies did their best to change product names to get incremental revenue above and beyond the yearly 15% maintenance fee but that is a dead end business model for a confined software industry like EDA.
The concept of a 3-year time-based license business model came from Avant! (definitely not a status quo company). I salute the person who came up with it, it literally saved EDA. I doubt it was Gerry Hsu (Avanti CEO) but he most certainly took credit for it. I sold time-based licenses at Avanti and I can tell you it was one of the reasons Avant! did so well. Business models are everything.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- NPU IP Core for Edge
- Specialized Video Processing NPU IP
- HYPERBUS™ Memory Controller
- AV1 Video Encoder IP
Related Blogs
- Why Did EDA Have a Hardware Business Model?
- Business Models: EDA Is Software But It Used To Be Sold As Hardware
- Taiwan Trip Report: Semiconductors, EDA, and the ASIC Business!
- The Semiconductor IDM Business Model is Dead!
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility