EDA / IP Business Model Debate: Daniel Nenni versus Aart de Geus
First, lets review the business model transitions EDA has seen. We started with perpetual licensing which is a software license for the life of the product. EDA companies did their best to change product names to get incremental revenue above and beyond the yearly 15% maintenance fee but that is a dead end business model for a confined software industry like EDA.
The concept of a 3-year time-based license business model came from Avant! (definitely not a status quo company). I salute the person who came up with it, it literally saved EDA. I doubt it was Gerry Hsu (Avanti CEO) but he most certainly took credit for it. I sold time-based licenses at Avanti and I can tell you it was one of the reasons Avant! did so well. Business models are everything.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 1.2V/1.8V GPIO Compliant with multiple standards in TSMC 16nm
- SLVS Transceiver in TSMC 28nm
- 0.9V/2.5V I/O Library in TSMC 55nm
- 1.8V/3.3V Multi-Voltage GPIO in TSMC 28nm
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with 5V ODIO & Analog in TSMC 16nm
Related Blogs
- Why Did EDA Have a Hardware Business Model?
- Business Models: EDA Is Software But It Used To Be Sold As Hardware
- Taiwan Trip Report: Semiconductors, EDA, and the ASIC Business!
- Foundry and IP Business Model: Alive and Well
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Unveils the Industry’s First eUSB2V2 IP Solutions
- Half of the Compute Shipped to Top Hyperscalers in 2025 will be Arm-based
- Industry's First Verification IP for Display Port Automotive Extensions (DP AE)
- IMG DXT GPU: A Game-Changer for Gaming Smartphones
- Rivos and Canonical partner to deliver scalable RISC-V solutions in Data Centers and enable an enterprise-grade Ubuntu experience across Rivos platforms