Intel Bay Trail Fail
Now that the IDF 2013 euphoria is fading I would like to play devil’s advocate and make a case for why Intel is still not ready to compete in the mobile market. It was very clear from the keynotes that Intel is a chip company, always has been, always will be, and that will not get them the market share they need to be relevant in mobile electronics, just my devil's advocate opinion of course.
The first argument is the Bay Trail tablet offerings which are mediocre at best. The WinSuperSite has a nice Fall Tablet Preview with pictures and everything you need to know to decide NOT to buy one. Notice there are no Bay Trail smartphones, just tablets big and small. How many people or corporations buy the same brand tablet and phone? How many people or corporations will buy a new tablet every two years like they do smartphones? I still have my iPad2, and, like my laptop, I have no plans to replace it until I absolutely have to (3-5 years). My bet is that there will be a fire sale on Bay Trail devices next year so wait until then if you really want one.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- ML-KEM Key Encapsulation & ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
Related Blogs
- In Verification, Failing to Plan = Planning to Fail
- Opinion: Why IDEs for hardware design fail
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
- EDAC CEOs: consolidation, clouds, and whether Intel will buy Synopsys
Latest Blogs
- PCIe Low-Power Validation Challenges and Potential Solutions (PIPE/L1 Substates)
- Rethinking Edge AI Interconnects: Why Multi-Protocol Is the New Standard
- Tidying Up: FIPS-Compliant Secure Zeroization for OTP
- Accelerating Your Development: Simplify SoC I/O with a Single Multi-Protocol SerDes IP
- Why What Where DIFI and the new version 1.3