In-house layout goes the way of home-grown EDA
April 15, 2013
I think the practical end to in-house layout may be in sight. I say this for several reasons; complexity, learning curve, peak-load labor requirements and alternative use of manpower.
Let’s take a look at each issue and see what one might conclude. I think I have it right, but who knows, maybe I’m the only one that sees the murky end to internal layout teams at most organizations.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- ML-KEM Key Encapsulation & ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
Related Blogs
- A Fast and Seamless Way to Burst to the Cloud for Peak EDA Workloads
- Navigating the Future of EDA: The Transformative Impact of AI and ML
- DAC 2024 - Showcasing the future of RISC-V through EDA
- Announcing the launch of CHERI Alliance: A unified front against digital threats
Latest Blogs
- PCIe Low-Power Validation Challenges and Potential Solutions (PIPE/L1 Substates)
- Rethinking Edge AI Interconnects: Why Multi-Protocol Is the New Standard
- Tidying Up: FIPS-Compliant Secure Zeroization for OTP
- Accelerating Your Development: Simplify SoC I/O with a Single Multi-Protocol SerDes IP
- Why What Where DIFI and the new version 1.3