How to Balance Directed and Constraint Random Testing
A critical aspect of any VIP, is the test suite. Without appropriate type of tests, it would be impossible to verify design optimally. One must take care to ensure that the tests cover all important areas of the design that are to be verified.
Let us start by asking - what is the difference between directed tests and constraint random tests?
Directed tests are simple tests, wherein a particular scenario is recreated for a known feature, and the expectations are set accordingly. Constraint random tests can cover a wide number of scenarios and/or multiple configurations. This is possible because the scenario generated is randomized with constraints, restricting parameters to values defined within the specification range.
Note: While an IP designer would wish to verify all the features using constraint random tests, a verification engineer would want to use as few constraint random tests as possible.
What are the trade-offs of using directed tests versus constraint random tests?
Related Semiconductor IP
- RVA23, Multi-cluster, Hypervisor and Android
- 64 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 2048-bit VLEN and AMM
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- RISC-V AI Acceleration Platform - Scalable, standards-aligned soft chiplet IP
- H.264 Decoder
Related Blogs
- How to Shift Left on Low-Power Design Verification, Early and Quickly
- How to Maximize PCIe 6.0's Advantages with End-to-End PCIe Design Solutions
- FPGAs or ASICs - What Are Their Differences and Similarities and How to Use Them for Security?
- How to Augment SoC Development to Conquer Your Design Hurdles
Latest Blogs
- How fast a GPU do you need for your user interface?
- PCIe 6.x and 112 Gbps Ethernet: Synopsys and TeraSignal Achieve Optical Interconnect Breakthroughs
- Powering the Future of RF: Falcomm and GlobalFoundries at IMS 2025
- The Coming NPU Population Collapse
- Driving the Future of High-Speed Computing with PCIe 7.0 Innovation