How to Balance Directed and Constraint Random Testing
A critical aspect of any VIP, is the test suite. Without appropriate type of tests, it would be impossible to verify design optimally. One must take care to ensure that the tests cover all important areas of the design that are to be verified.
Let us start by asking - what is the difference between directed tests and constraint random tests?
Directed tests are simple tests, wherein a particular scenario is recreated for a known feature, and the expectations are set accordingly. Constraint random tests can cover a wide number of scenarios and/or multiple configurations. This is possible because the scenario generated is randomized with constraints, restricting parameters to values defined within the specification range.
Note: While an IP designer would wish to verify all the features using constraint random tests, a verification engineer would want to use as few constraint random tests as possible.
What are the trade-offs of using directed tests versus constraint random tests?
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flexible Pixel Processor Video IP
- Complex Digital Up Converter
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- Verification IP for Ultra Ethernet (UEC)
- MIPI SWI3S Manager Core IP
Related Blogs
- How to Solve the Size, Weight, Power and Cooling Challenge in Radar & Radio Frequency Modulation Classification
- How to Maximize PCIe 6.0's Advantages with End-to-End PCIe Design Solutions
- FPGAs or ASICs - What Are Their Differences and Similarities and How to Use Them for Security?
- How to Augment SoC Development to Conquer Your Design Hurdles
Latest Blogs
- CNNs and Transformers: Decoding the Titans of AI
- How is RISC-V’s open and customizable design changing embedded systems?
- Imagination GPUs now support Vulkan 1.4 and Android 16
- From "What-If" to "What-Is": Cadence IP Validation for Silicon Platform Success
- Accelerating RTL Design with Agentic AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Driven Approach