Ex ante: disclose IP before, not after standardization
August 20, 2012
Many of the audience here are involved in standards bodies and specification development, so the news from the Apple v. Samsung on the invocation of ex ante in today's testimony is useful.
I worked with VITA, the folks behind the VME family of board-level embedded technology, on their ex ante policy several years ago, and can share that insight. I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, so this is the highly simplified, non-legalese version of the rules. Consult your legal department with any questions.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- DDR5 MRDIMM PHY and Controller
- RVA23, Multi-cluster, Hypervisor and Android
- HBM4E PHY and controller
- 64 bit RISC-V Multicore Processor with 2048-bit VLEN and AMM
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
Related Blogs
- Rambus Achieves PCI Express® (PCIe®) 5.0 Compliance for PCIe 5.0 Controller IP and Inspector PCIe 5.0 Interposer with Diagnostic IP
- Rambus Expands Quantum Safe Solutions with Quantum Safe Engine IP
- Explaining CAST’s Flexible IP Licensing
- The semiconductor IP business: the Imagination overview
Latest Blogs
- How Arasan’s SoundWire PHY Can Elevate Your Next Audio SoC
- Cadence Leads the Way at PCI-SIG DevCon 2025 with Groundbreaking PCIe 7.0 Demos
- Introducing the Akeana 1000 Series Processors
- How fast a GPU do you need for your user interface?
- PCIe 6.x and 112 Gbps Ethernet: Synopsys and TeraSignal Achieve Optical Interconnect Breakthroughs