Apples Versus Zebras
I have seen a couple of posts comparing the density of the Apple A8 to the Intel Core M and concluding that the TSMC 20nm process is denser than the Intel 14nm process. In one of the threads one of the posters likened this to comparing apples to oranges, I agree except I think it is even worse than that, I think it is more like comparing apples to zebras and here is why.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC CLN3FFP HBM4 PHY
- Wi-Fi 7(be) RF Transceiver IP in TSMC 22nm
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with 5V ODIO & Analog in TSMC 16nm
- HBM3 PHY V2 (Hard) - TSMC N3P
- USB4 Gen3 x2-lane PHY, TSMC N5, 1.2V, N/S orientation, type-C
Related Blogs
- TSMC Versus Global Foundries
- Blogging from Taiwan: TSMC versus SMIC
- UMC versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES
- TSMC versus Global Foundries Part II
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Leads the Way at PCI-SIG DevCon 2025 with Groundbreaking PCIe 7.0 Demos
- Introducing the Akeana 1000 Series Processors
- How fast a GPU do you need for your user interface?
- PCIe 6.x and 112 Gbps Ethernet: Synopsys and TeraSignal Achieve Optical Interconnect Breakthroughs
- Powering the Future of RF: Falcomm and GlobalFoundries at IMS 2025