Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- ISO/IEC 7816 Verification IP
- 50MHz to 800MHz Integer-N RC Phase-Locked Loop on SMIC 55nm LL
- Simulation VIP for AMBA CHI-C2C
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
Related Blogs
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Processor design automation to drive innovation and foster differentiation
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
Latest Blogs
- A Comparison on Different AMBA 5 CHI Verification IPs
- Cadence Recognized as TSMC OIP Partner of the Year at 2025 OIP Ecosystem Forum
- Accelerating Development Cycles and Scalable, High-Performance On-Device AI with New Arm Lumex CSS Platform
- Desktop-Quality Ray-Traced Gaming and Intelligent AI Performance on Mobile with New Arm Mali G1-Ultra GPU
- Powering Scale Up and Scale Out with 224G SerDes for UALink and Ultra Ethernet