Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- CAN XL Verification IP
- Rad-Hard GPIO, ODIO & LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 1.22V/1uA Reference voltage and current source
- 1.2V SLVS Transceiver in UMC 110nm
- Neuromorphic Processor IP
Related Blogs
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Processor design automation to drive innovation and foster differentiation
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
Latest Blogs
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- UWB, Digital Keys, and the Quest for Greater Range
- Building Smarter, Faster: How Arm Compute Subsystems Accelerate the Future of Chip Design
- MIPS P8700 RISC-V Processor for Advanced Functional Safety Systems
- Boost SoC Flexibility: 4 Design Tips for Memory Subsystems with Combo DDR3/4 Interfaces