Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Configurable CPU tailored precisely to your needs
- Ultra high-performance low-power ADC
- HiFi iQ DSP
- CXL 4 Verification IP
- JESD204E Controller IP
Related Blogs
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Processor design automation to drive innovation and foster differentiation
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
Latest Blogs
- The Memory Imperative for Next-Generation AI Accelerator SoCs
- Leadership in CAN XL strengthens Bosch’s position in vehicle communication
- Validating UPLI Protocol Across Topologies with Cadence UALink VIP
- Cadence Tapes Out 32GT/s UCIe IP Subsystem on Samsung 4nm Technology
- LPDDR6 vs. LPDDR5 and LPDDR5X: What’s the Difference?