Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flexible Pixel Processor Video IP
- Complex Digital Up Converter
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- Verification IP for Ultra Ethernet (UEC)
- MIPI SWI3S Manager Core IP
Related Blogs
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Processor design automation to drive innovation and foster differentiation
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
- Wi-Fi 7 (IEEE 802.11be) & MLO vs. Wi-Fi 6/6E (IEEE 802.11ax): What to Ask for Optimal Design Considerations
Latest Blogs
- CNNs and Transformers: Decoding the Titans of AI
- How is RISC-V’s open and customizable design changing embedded systems?
- Imagination GPUs now support Vulkan 1.4 and Android 16
- From "What-If" to "What-Is": Cadence IP Validation for Silicon Platform Success
- Accelerating RTL Design with Agentic AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Driven Approach