Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Network-on-Chip (NoC)
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
- DVB-S2 Demodulator
- UCIe PHY (Die-to-Die) IP
- UCIe-S 64GT/s PHY IP
Related Blogs
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Processor design automation to drive innovation and foster differentiation
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
Latest Blogs
- Enabling End-to-End EDA Flow on Arm-Based Compute for Infrastructure Flexibility
- Real PPA improvements from analog IC migration
- Design specification: The cornerstone of an ASIC collaboration
- The importance of ADCs in low-power electrocardiography ASICs
- VESA Adaptive-Sync V2 Operation in DisplayPort VIP