Using customizable MCUs to bridge the gap between dedicated SoC ASSPs, ASICs and FPGAs: Part 1
Jun 13 2007 (18:15 PM), Embedded.com
Custom ASICs always offer the best performance, power consumption, security and unit cost of any silicon-based solution. Cell-based ASICs provide the best characteristics because the poly and diffusion layers for interconnect, and transistors can be sized to optimize speed, density, and power dissipation according to each particular cell's requirements.
This approach provides for a silicon-efficient design, but is expensive because it requires a full mask set. Mask costs increase sharply with shrinking process technology or feature size.
Indeed, the $250,000+ cost of a full 130 nm mask set and the lengthy design time associated with standard cell ASICs puts them out of reach for many products. In fact, in applications such as MP3 players or cell phones, the technology evolves so rapidly that the next generation product must be launched every six months -- about half the time required to implement a cell-based ASIC.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Post-Quantum Digital Signature IP Core
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
- Power-OK Monitor
- RISC-V-Based, Open Source AI Accelerator for the Edge
- Securyzr™ neo Core Platform
Related White Papers
- Bridging the gap between custom ASICs and ARM-based MCUs
- Using PSS and UVM Register Models to Verify SoC Integration
- NoCs and the transition to multi-die systems using chiplets
- Implementing custom DDR and DDR2 SDRAM external memory interfaces in FPGAs (part 1)
Latest White Papers
- DRsam: Detection of Fault-Based Microarchitectural Side-Channel Attacks in RISC-V Using Statistical Preprocessing and Association Rule Mining
- ShuffleV: A Microarchitectural Defense Strategy against Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks in Microprocessors
- Practical Considerations of LDPC Decoder Design in Communications Systems
- A Direct Memory Access Controller (DMAC) for Irregular Data Transfers on RISC-V Linux Systems
- A logically correct SoC design isn’t an optimized design