Use formal, online communication to deliver design quality closure
Stephane Bonniol, Satin IP Technologies
EE Times (11/16/2009 12:01 AM EST)
If an integrated circuit design is to meet the need for high-quality/low-risk implementation, the need for formal communication among the participants in the design process is obviously necessary. When design engineers, design managers and mask shop engineers are at multiple sites--each team and each site working within their own schedule constraints--moving communication online is a must.
Online communication lets system-on-chip integrators do their jobs in parallel to intellectual property design and software development, and in complete awareness of the design-for-mask-manufacturing (DFFM) constraints imposed by the next engineering steps.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Post-Quantum Digital Signature IP Core
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
- Power-OK Monitor
- RISC-V-Based, Open Source AI Accelerator for the Edge
- Securyzr™ neo Core Platform
Related White Papers
- Analog design quality closure: What’s missing from current flows?
- Agile Analog's Approach to Analog IP Design and Quality --- Why "Silicon Proven" is NOT What You Think
- IP users value quality, support
- SoCs: Supporting Socketization -> Methodology key to quality
Latest White Papers
- DRsam: Detection of Fault-Based Microarchitectural Side-Channel Attacks in RISC-V Using Statistical Preprocessing and Association Rule Mining
- ShuffleV: A Microarchitectural Defense Strategy against Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks in Microprocessors
- Practical Considerations of LDPC Decoder Design in Communications Systems
- A Direct Memory Access Controller (DMAC) for Irregular Data Transfers on RISC-V Linux Systems
- A logically correct SoC design isn’t an optimized design