Speed up communications standards development
Mike Woodward, The MathWorks
Nov 03, 2005 (5:00 AM)
CommsDesign
Developing communications standards is an increasingly difficult task. Due to the cost, complexity and specialized knowledge needed, today's standards are usually developed using a consortium approach, one that often adds to development problems. Driven by several factors, this approach to standards development has been used since the late 1980s. Complexity is a key factor, both at the system and algorithm levels.
Each new generation of standards is at least an order of magnitude more complex than its predecessor. As a result, the cost of developing standards has increased, in most cases, beyond the level that an individual company would be comfortable shouldering. The growing size and complexity of standards also means that more companies are needed to provide the specialized skills required. Because international markets are now a target of most standards, involving companies from different countries helps with regulatory and market acceptance.
By its very nature, standards development requires a nimble approach; every time the standard consortium adopts a change, models must be updated and re-run. More partners in the consortium can mean more changes.
The traditional approach to standards development, using C models, is ill-suited for this kind of rapid and iterative development. Model-based design provides an alternative method of modeling communications standards with hierarchical, block-based models that drastically reduces the time required to make modifications.
Nov 03, 2005 (5:00 AM)
CommsDesign
Developing communications standards is an increasingly difficult task. Due to the cost, complexity and specialized knowledge needed, today's standards are usually developed using a consortium approach, one that often adds to development problems. Driven by several factors, this approach to standards development has been used since the late 1980s. Complexity is a key factor, both at the system and algorithm levels.
Each new generation of standards is at least an order of magnitude more complex than its predecessor. As a result, the cost of developing standards has increased, in most cases, beyond the level that an individual company would be comfortable shouldering. The growing size and complexity of standards also means that more companies are needed to provide the specialized skills required. Because international markets are now a target of most standards, involving companies from different countries helps with regulatory and market acceptance.
By its very nature, standards development requires a nimble approach; every time the standard consortium adopts a change, models must be updated and re-run. More partners in the consortium can mean more changes.
The traditional approach to standards development, using C models, is ill-suited for this kind of rapid and iterative development. Model-based design provides an alternative method of modeling communications standards with hierarchical, block-based models that drastically reduces the time required to make modifications.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
- ASIL B Compliant MIPI CSI-2 CSE2 Security Module
- SHA-256 Secure Hash Algorithm IP Core
Related Articles
- Testable SoCs : Test flow speeds up MP3 decoder development to eight weeks
- Reconfiguring Design -> FPGAs speed audio application development
- DSP hardware extensions speed up 3G wireless multimedia
- Embedded multicore needs communications standards
Latest Articles
- A 129FPS Full HD Real-Time Accelerator for 3D Gaussian Splatting
- SkipOPU: An FPGA-based Overlay Processor for Large Language Models with Dynamically Allocated Computation
- TensorPool: A 3D-Stacked 8.4TFLOPS/4.3W Many-Core Domain-Specific Processor for AI-Native Radio Access Networks
- Assertain: Automated Security Assertion Generation Using Large Language Models
- VolTune: A Fine-Grained Runtime Voltage Control Architecture for FPGA Systems