Building more secure embedded software with code coverage analysis
David and Mike Kleidermacher, Green Hills Software
embedded.com (September 18, 2013)
A comprehensive test regimen, including functional, regression, performance, and coverage testing, is one of the best mechanisms to assure that software is reliable and secure. Indeed, testing is an important component of many high-assurance development standards and guidance documents, such as that promulgated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
In addition, two approaches to testing are almost always required to ensure security. First, all software within security-critical components must be covered by some form of functional test: white-box, black box, fault-based, error-based and stress.. Then coverage is verified using code coverage tools. Further, all security-critical software must be traceable to the software’s component requirements. Software that fails to trace back to a test and to a requirement is more likely to introduce latent security vulnerabilities.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 Controller IP
- Post-Quantum ML-KEM IP Core
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Manager IP
Related White Papers
- Five steps to reliable, low-cost, bug-free software with static code analysis
- Embedded Software Unit Testing with Ceedling
- SoC Test and Verification -> Coverage analysis essential in ATE
- Code Coverage is Crucial in the IP Qualification Process
Latest White Papers
- Attack on a PUF-based Secure Binary Neural Network
- BBOPlace-Bench: Benchmarking Black-Box Optimization for Chip Placement
- FD-SOI: A Cyber-Resilient Substrate Against Laser Fault Injection—The Future Platform for Secure Automotive Electronics
- In-DRAM True Random Number Generation Using Simultaneous Multiple-Row Activation: An Experimental Study of Real DRAM Chips
- SPAD: Specialized Prefill and Decode Hardware for Disaggregated LLM Inference