The fabless-foundry model will survive (at least through 14-nm)
Handel Jones, International Business Strategies Inc.,
EETimes (6/15/2012 6:59 PM EDT)
Editor's note: This article was rewritten in rebutal to comments made in April by Mark Bohr, an Intel Senior Fellow. As reported by EE Times, Bohr said the fabless-foundry model is"collapsing."
What are the problems?
1. Parametric yields at 28 nm are not at expected levels. Process variables such as random dopant fluctuations, line width and line gap variations, and via resistance, which affect RC-related timing issues, result in both unpredictable and low parametric yields for the targeted specifications. The process variables have increasing impact on leakage, power consumption and yields.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- SM4 Cipher Engine
- Ultra-High-Speed Time-Interleaved 7-bit 64GSPS ADC on 3nm
- Fault Tolerant DDR2/DDR3/DDR4 Memory controller
Related News
- eInfochips announces DDR2 SDRAM SystemVerilog & VMM based Memory Model Generator Tool
- TSMC Selects Legend's Model Diagnoser for Standard Cell Library Quality Assurance
- HDL Design House announces AT25DF161 VITAL behavioral model
- Carbon Design Systems Adds Co-Simulation Model Library to Expanding System-Level Validation Tool Suite
Latest News
- AccelerComm and Radisys Secure Funding from UK Space Agency for Next Generation 5G Satellites
- AI Drives PCIe Aspirations
- Analog Bits Awarded TSMC's 2025 OIP Partner of the Year Award
- Qualcomm Achieves Complete Victory Over Arm in Litigation Challenging Licensing Agreements
- SEGGER delivers day-one J-Link and Flasher support for Arm China's new STAR-MC3