TSMC versus GlobalFoundries: Semiconductor Design Enablement!
August 9, 2010
As mentioned in previous blogs, design enablement is a key enabler to fabless semiconductor design and manufacture, without question. The purpose of this blog (in 500 words) is to compare and contrast two very different design enablement strategies and engage the semiconductor community in a meaningful discussion.
The GlobalFoundry strategy is straight forward so let’s start there. GFI is partnering with leading design enablement companies to advance semiconductor design at the 28nm node. GFI is committed to becoming the FIRST SOURCE for 28nm, competing directly with TSMC, while other foundries have in the past offered “T” like processes for 2nd and 3rd source manufacturing strategies (UMC, Chartered Semi, SMIC).
Related Semiconductor IP
- SHA-256 Secure Hash Algorithm IP Core
- EdDSA Curve25519 signature generation engine
- DeWarp IP
- 6-bit, 12 GSPS Flash ADC - GlobalFoundries 22nm
- LunaNet AFS LDPC Encoder and Decoder IP Core
Related Blogs
- TSMC vs GlobalFoundries vs IBM
- TSMC vs GlobalFoundries IBM Samsung
- How to Obtain ASIC Full Turnkey Services from TSMC and GLOBALFOUNDRIES?
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
Latest Blogs
- Area, Pipelining, Integration: A Comparison of SHA-2 and SHA-3 for embedded Systems.
- Why Your Next Smartphone Needs Micro-Cooling
- Teaching AI Agents to Speak Hardware
- SOCAMM: Modernizing Data Center Memory with LPDDR6/5X
- Bridging the Gap: Why eFPGA Integration is a Managed Reality, Not a Schedule Risk