TSMC vs Intel vs Samsung FinFETs
By definition the pure-play foundry business model separates the design and manufacturing of a semiconductor device. TSMC was the first dedicated (pure-play) foundry which enabled the incredible fabless semiconductor ecosystem we have today. If not for the fabless business model we would not have the supercomputer class mobile devices in our pockets. We, as integral parts of the fabless semiconductor ecosystem, have changed the world, absolutely.
So the question is: As an executive for a fabless semiconductor company, why would you even consider turning back the clock and renting fab space from an IDM (a company that both designs and manufactures semiconductor devices)?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Hybrid Memory Cube Verification IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
Related Blogs
- The Apple Samsung TSMC Intel 14nm Mashup!
- "Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
- Intel to Skip 10nm to Stay Ahead of TSMC and Samsung?
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
Latest Blogs
- PUF vs. HSM? Why It's Not Either/Or for IoT Compliance
- Enter the Arena: How Our Toolchain Started Improving Itself
- Bridging the MACsec Gap: Add Line-Rate Security Without Redesigning Your Ethernet Subsystem
- Synopsys Earns Five TSMC Open Innovation Platform Partner of the Year Awards for Advancing AI-Driven Semiconductor Innovation
- From Bug Hunting to Engineering Methodology: Lessons from AI-Driven Development