TSMC vs Intel vs Samsung FinFETs
By definition the pure-play foundry business model separates the design and manufacturing of a semiconductor device. TSMC was the first dedicated (pure-play) foundry which enabled the incredible fabless semiconductor ecosystem we have today. If not for the fabless business model we would not have the supercomputer class mobile devices in our pockets. We, as integral parts of the fabless semiconductor ecosystem, have changed the world, absolutely.
So the question is: As an executive for a fabless semiconductor company, why would you even consider turning back the clock and renting fab space from an IDM (a company that both designs and manufactures semiconductor devices)?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
- 10-bit Pipeline ADC - Tower 180 nm
- NoC Verification IP
- Simulation VIP for Ethernet UEC
- Automotive Grade PLLs, Oscillators, SerDes PMAs, LVDS/CML IP
Related Blogs
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
- The Apple Samsung TSMC Intel 14nm Mashup!
- "Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
- Intel to Skip 10nm to Stay Ahead of TSMC and Samsung?
Latest Blogs
- CAVP-Validated Post-Quantum Cryptography
- The role of AI processor architecture in power consumption efficiency
- Evaluating the Side Channel Security of Post-Quantum Hardware IP
- A Golden Source As The Single Source Of Truth In HSI
- ONFI 5.2: What’s new in Open NAND Flash Interface's latest 5.2 standard