TSMC vs Intel vs Samsung FinFETs
June 9, 2014
By definition the pure-play foundry business model separates the design and manufacturing of a semiconductor device. TSMC was the first dedicated (pure-play) foundry which enabled the incredible fabless semiconductor ecosystem we have today. If not for the fabless business model we would not have the supercomputer class mobile devices in our pockets. We, as integral parts of the fabless semiconductor ecosystem, have changed the world, absolutely.
So the question is: As an executive for a fabless semiconductor company, why would you even consider turning back the clock and renting fab space from an IDM (a company that both designs and manufactures semiconductor devices)?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- 25MHz to 4.0GHz Fractional-N RC PLL Synthesizer on TSMC 3nm N3P
- AGILEX 7 R-Tile Gen5 NVMe Host IP
- 100G PAM4 Serdes PHY - 14nm
- Bluetooth Low Energy Subsystem IP
Related Blogs
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
- The Apple Samsung TSMC Intel 14nm Mashup!
- "Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
- Intel to Skip 10nm to Stay Ahead of TSMC and Samsung?
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Powers AI Infra Summit '25: Memory, Interconnect, and Interface Focus
- Integrating TDD Into the Product Development Lifecycle
- The Hidden Threat in Analog IC Migration: Why Electromigration rules can make or break your next tapeout
- MIPI CCI over I3C: Faster Camera Control for SoC Architects
- aTENNuate: Real-Time Audio Denoising