TSMC vs Intel vs Samsung FinFETs
By definition the pure-play foundry business model separates the design and manufacturing of a semiconductor device. TSMC was the first dedicated (pure-play) foundry which enabled the incredible fabless semiconductor ecosystem we have today. If not for the fabless business model we would not have the supercomputer class mobile devices in our pockets. We, as integral parts of the fabless semiconductor ecosystem, have changed the world, absolutely.
So the question is: As an executive for a fabless semiconductor company, why would you even consider turning back the clock and renting fab space from an IDM (a company that both designs and manufactures semiconductor devices)?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Configurable CPU tailored precisely to your needs
- Ultra high-performance low-power ADC
- HiFi iQ DSP
- CXL 4 Verification IP
- JESD204E Controller IP
Related Blogs
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
- The Apple Samsung TSMC Intel 14nm Mashup!
- "Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
- Intel to Skip 10nm to Stay Ahead of TSMC and Samsung?
Latest Blogs
- The Memory Imperative for Next-Generation AI Accelerator SoCs
- Leadership in CAN XL strengthens Bosch’s position in vehicle communication
- Validating UPLI Protocol Across Topologies with Cadence UALink VIP
- Cadence Tapes Out 32GT/s UCIe IP Subsystem on Samsung 4nm Technology
- LPDDR6 vs. LPDDR5 and LPDDR5X: What’s the Difference?