TSMC vs Intel vs Samsung FinFETs
By definition the pure-play foundry business model separates the design and manufacturing of a semiconductor device. TSMC was the first dedicated (pure-play) foundry which enabled the incredible fabless semiconductor ecosystem we have today. If not for the fabless business model we would not have the supercomputer class mobile devices in our pockets. We, as integral parts of the fabless semiconductor ecosystem, have changed the world, absolutely.
So the question is: As an executive for a fabless semiconductor company, why would you even consider turning back the clock and renting fab space from an IDM (a company that both designs and manufactures semiconductor devices)?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- ISO/IEC 7816 Verification IP
- 50MHz to 800MHz Integer-N RC Phase-Locked Loop on SMIC 55nm LL
- Simulation VIP for AMBA CHI-C2C
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
Related Blogs
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
- The Apple Samsung TSMC Intel 14nm Mashup!
- "Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
- Intel to Skip 10nm to Stay Ahead of TSMC and Samsung?
Latest Blogs
- A Comparison on Different AMBA 5 CHI Verification IPs
- Cadence Recognized as TSMC OIP Partner of the Year at 2025 OIP Ecosystem Forum
- Accelerating Development Cycles and Scalable, High-Performance On-Device AI with New Arm Lumex CSS Platform
- Desktop-Quality Ray-Traced Gaming and Intelligent AI Performance on Mobile with New Arm Mali G1-Ultra GPU
- Powering Scale Up and Scale Out with 224G SerDes for UALink and Ultra Ethernet