TSMC vs Intel vs Samsung FinFETs
By definition the pure-play foundry business model separates the design and manufacturing of a semiconductor device. TSMC was the first dedicated (pure-play) foundry which enabled the incredible fabless semiconductor ecosystem we have today. If not for the fabless business model we would not have the supercomputer class mobile devices in our pockets. We, as integral parts of the fabless semiconductor ecosystem, have changed the world, absolutely.
So the question is: As an executive for a fabless semiconductor company, why would you even consider turning back the clock and renting fab space from an IDM (a company that both designs and manufactures semiconductor devices)?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- LPDDR6/5X/5 PHY V2 - Intel 18A-P
- ML-KEM Key Encapsulation & ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- MIPI SoundWire I3S Peripheral IP
- ML-DSA Digital Signature Engine
- P1619 / 802.1ae (MACSec) GCM/XTS/CBC-AES Core
Related Blogs
- TSMC (Lincoln) vs Samsung (Clinton) vs Intel (Washington)
- The Apple Samsung TSMC Intel 14nm Mashup!
- "Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
- Intel to Skip 10nm to Stay Ahead of TSMC and Samsung?
Latest Blogs
- How Network-on-Chip Architectures Are Powering the Future of Microcontroller Design
- PCIe Low-Power Validation Challenges and Potential Solutions (PIPE/L1 Substates)
- Rethinking Edge AI Interconnects: Why Multi-Protocol Is the New Standard
- Tidying Up: FIPS-Compliant Secure Zeroization for OTP
- Accelerating Your Development: Simplify SoC I/O with a Single Multi-Protocol SerDes IP