Should Intel Offer Foundry Services?
This has been a heated topic since Intel announced that it would open its manufacturing facilities to the fabless ecosystem more than a year ago. I for one think it is a colossal mistake and I'm not surprised that many others share this view. IDM’s offering of excess manufacturing capacity to semiconductor design companies started the fabless revolution so this is Deja vu all over again. Those same IDMs are now fabless, fab lite, or out of business. Right?
Intel’s first foundry customers made complete sense. Achronix and Tabula are emerging FPGA companies meaning Intel can closely control the flow of process information. Achronix was an equity investment using the ASIC model where Intel does all of the heavy lifting so the process recipe never leaves the building. Ditto for Netronome. Altera however is more the traditional foundry model and this is where Intel crossed the insanity line, absolutely.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- SM4 Cipher Engine
- Ultra-High-Speed Time-Interleaved 7-bit 64GSPS ADC on 3nm
- Fault Tolerant DDR2/DDR3/DDR4 Memory controller
Related Blogs
- SiFive collaborates with new Intel Foundry Services to enable innovative new RISC-V computing platforms
- Cadence Joins Intel Foundry Accelerator Design Services Alliance
- Can Intel be a Leading Semiconductor Foundry?
- Will Intel leave Mobile, Foundry, and FPGA Business?
Latest Blogs
- Shaping the Future of Semiconductor Design Through Collaboration: Synopsys Wins Multiple TSMC OIP Partner of the Year Awards
- Pushing the Boundaries of Memory: What’s New with Weebit and AI
- Root of Trust: A Security Essential for Cyber Defense
- Evolution of AMBA AXI Protocol: An Introduction to the Issue L Update
- An Introduction to AMBA CHI Chip-to-Chip (C2C) Protocol