How did JEDEC UFS beat the MIPI CSI3 and DSI2 in adoption race?
Current trends indicate JEDEC UFS has made it first to market leaving its other counterparts MIPI CSI3 and MIPI DSI2 behind in the race to harness the advantages of MIPI UniPro and MIPI M-PHY.
At Arrow Devices, recently a casual lunch conversation turned in to intense debate on the reasons behind early adoption of JEDEC UFS over the MIPI CSI3 and MIPI DSI2. We compared these three technologies, as all three are end applications that will make use of MIPI UniPro and MIPI M-PHY as its service delivery mechanism.
So what led to the faster adoption of JEDEC UFS over MIPI CSI3 and MIPI DSI2?
Here is what we think on why this has happened…
In a nutshell, it was driven by the broader and higher impact of JEDEC UFS on user experience compared to MIPI CSI3 and MIPI DSI2.
Related Semiconductor IP
- eDP 2.0 Verification IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- LLM AI IP Core
- Post-Quantum Digital Signature IP Core
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
Related Blogs
- High Speed Memory in Smart Phones: MIPI UniPro v1.8 for JEDEC UFS v3.0
- MIPI CSI3 Verification - Top 3 Challenges
- JEDEC UFS Verification - Top 3 Challenges
- Doing JEDEC or MIPI IP Verification? Here Are Some Test Plans
Latest Blogs
- Enhancing PCIe6.0 Performance: Flit Sequence Numbers and Selective NAK Explained
- Smarter ASICs and SoCs: Unlocking Real-World Connectivity with eFPGA and Data Converters
- RISC-V Takes First Step Toward International Standardization as ISO/IEC JTC1 Grants PAS Submitter Status
- Running Optimized PyTorch Models on Cadence DSPs with ExecuTorch
- PCIe 6.x: Synopsys IP Selected as First Gold System for Compliance Testing