EDA and Systems Design Converge...Or Do They?
For decades systems designers and IC designers have taken different paths. The former have relied primarily on block-level schematics for hardware definition. Except for teams facile in FPGAs, they have treated the chips in their designs as frozen blocks. For verification they have trusted prototypes over any form of simulation.
In contrast, IC designers long ago moved to language-based hardware description—first to describe the flow of data through registers in a synchronous digital design, and later to describe the function and interconnection of blocks at behavioral level. These designers, constrained by the multi-million-dollar costs of building a prototype IC to see how it works, rely on software simulation and formal analysis as verification tools, selectively using FPGA-based prototypes to complement these approaches.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- NPU IP Core for Edge
- Specialized Video Processing NPU IP
- HYPERBUS™ Memory Controller
- AV1 Video Encoder IP
Related Blogs
- ICCAD Keynote: Design of Secure Systems - Where are the EDA Tools?
- Design IP Growth Is Fueling 94% of EDA Expansion
- Can the Semiconductor Industry Overcome Thermal Design Challenges in Multi-Die Systems?
- AI will be increasingly important in EDA, reducing design costs and supporting engineers
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility