Picking the right MPSoC-based video architecture: Part 4
By Santanu Dutta, Jens Rennert, Tiehan Lv, Jiang Xu, Shengqi Yang, and Wayne Wolf
Embedded.com (08/18/09, 11:21:00 PM EDT)
To provide some perspective on what we discussed in Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3, in this last part in this series, we will consider the important topic of characterization of applications and architectures.
To this end, trace-driven simulation is widely used to evaluate computer architectures and are useful in MPSoC design. Because we know more about the application code to be executed on an application-specific MPSoC design, we can use execution traces to refine the design, starting with capturing fairly general characteristics of the application and moving toward a more detailed study of the application running on a refined architectural model.
Because video applications are computationally intensive, we expect that more than one platform SoC will be necessary to build video systems for quite some time. For some relatively simple applications, it is possible to build a single platform that can support a wide variety of software.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- Ultra-low power high dynamic range image sensor
- Flash Memory LDPC Decoder IP Core
- SLM Signal Integrity Monitor
- Digital PUF IP
Related White Papers
- Picking the right MPSoC-based video architecture: Part 1
- Processor Architecture for High Performance Video Decode
- Reconfiguring Design -> C-based architecture assembly supports custom design
- Consumer IC Advances -> Christmas list: tricks to enhance audio, video
Latest White Papers
- How Next-Gen Chips Are Unlocking RISC-V’s Customization Advantage
- Efficient Hardware-Assisted Heap Memory Safety for Embedded RISC-V Systems
- Automatically Retargeting Hardware and Code Generation for RISC-V Custom Instructions
- How Mature-Technology ASICs Can Give You the Edge
- Exploring the Latest Innovations in MIPI D-PHY and MIPI C-PHY