FPGA-to-ASIC integration provides flexibility in automotive microcontrollers
By Axel Zimmermann, Altera Europe
The primary benefit of using MCUs has been high level system integration combined with relatively low cost. However, there are hidden costs associated with these devices well beyond the unit price.
The widely applied microcontroller in automotive electronics is heading full-speed at a wall of time and cost. The primary benefit of using microcontrollers (MCUs) has been high level system integration combined with relatively low cost. However, there are hidden costs associated with these devices well beyond the unit price. For example, if the chosen part does not have just the right mix of features, it must be augmented with external logic, software, or other integrated devices.
Further, with rapidly changing end-market requirements far more common in today's automotive sector, MCUs often become quickly unavailable. Many MCUs equipped with specialized features and a fixed number of dedicated interfaces do not fulfill market requirements after a short evaluation period. Consequently, system suppliers are being forced to redesign their hardware and re-write associated software, in some cases even having to change the processor core.
The primary benefit of using MCUs has been high level system integration combined with relatively low cost. However, there are hidden costs associated with these devices well beyond the unit price.
The widely applied microcontroller in automotive electronics is heading full-speed at a wall of time and cost. The primary benefit of using microcontrollers (MCUs) has been high level system integration combined with relatively low cost. However, there are hidden costs associated with these devices well beyond the unit price. For example, if the chosen part does not have just the right mix of features, it must be augmented with external logic, software, or other integrated devices.
Further, with rapidly changing end-market requirements far more common in today's automotive sector, MCUs often become quickly unavailable. Many MCUs equipped with specialized features and a fixed number of dedicated interfaces do not fulfill market requirements after a short evaluation period. Consequently, system suppliers are being forced to redesign their hardware and re-write associated software, in some cases even having to change the processor core.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- eUSB2V2.0 Controller + PHY IP
- I/O Library with LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 50G PON LDPC Encoder/Decoder
- UALink Controller
- RISC-V Debug & Trace IP
Related Articles
- Fault-robust microcontrollers allow automotive technology convergence: Part 1, the nature of faults
- How to choose an RTOS for your FPGA and ASIC designs
- Comparing IP integration approaches for FPGA implementation
- Evolving passive optical networks (PONs) demand FPGA design flexibility
Latest Articles
- ChipBench: A Next-Step Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Performance in AI-Aided Chip Design
- COVERT: Trojan Detection in COTS Hardware via Statistical Activation of Microarchitectural Events
- A Reconfigurable Framework for AI-FPGA Agent Integration and Acceleration
- Veri-Sure: A Contract-Aware Multi-Agent Framework with Temporal Tracing and Formal Verification for Correct RTL Code Generation
- FlexLLM: Composable HLS Library for Flexible Hybrid LLM Accelerator Design