Why Verification IP Switching Costs Are a Myth
Many of you may have heard the story about the woodcutter and his blunt axe. The “Switching cost” of sharpening/buying a new axe may seem to be too high when in a time crunch. But a step back to review the situation and switching to a better tool can be life changing!
In today’s world this applies to chip design and verification teams more than ever. A Verification IP plays a key role in controlling verification schedules. Consider a case where tape out schedule is slipping in spite of having both - Internal VIP and External VIP.
Just like a blunt axe will take much longer to fell a tree, a sub standard Verification IP will prolong your IP Development. On the other hand if you “sharpen your axe” i.e. develop/buy a better Verification solution, it may initially seem like its taking longer and others are getting ahead. But, in the long run you will develop your IP faster.
In this blog, we take a deeper look at this much contemplated VIP “switching cost”.
Related Semiconductor IP
- Process/Voltage/Temperature Sensor with Self-calibration (Supply voltage 1.2V) - TSMC 3nm N3P
- USB 20Gbps Device Controller
- SM4 Cipher Engine
- Ultra-High-Speed Time-Interleaved 7-bit 64GSPS ADC on 3nm
- Fault Tolerant DDR2/DDR3/DDR4 Memory controller
Related Blogs
- Why Aerospace Semiconductor Designers Are Taking a Page from Their Automotive Friends
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
- 3 Reasons Why Verification Engineers should use Python instead of Perl
- Encryption: Why Backdoors Are a Bad Idea
Latest Blogs
- Shaping the Future of Semiconductor Design Through Collaboration: Synopsys Wins Multiple TSMC OIP Partner of the Year Awards
- Pushing the Boundaries of Memory: What’s New with Weebit and AI
- Root of Trust: A Security Essential for Cyber Defense
- Evolution of AMBA AXI Protocol: An Introduction to the Issue L Update
- An Introduction to AMBA CHI Chip-to-Chip (C2C) Protocol