Why Verification IP Switching Costs Are a Myth
Many of you may have heard the story about the woodcutter and his blunt axe. The “Switching cost” of sharpening/buying a new axe may seem to be too high when in a time crunch. But a step back to review the situation and switching to a better tool can be life changing!
In today’s world this applies to chip design and verification teams more than ever. A Verification IP plays a key role in controlling verification schedules. Consider a case where tape out schedule is slipping in spite of having both - Internal VIP and External VIP.
Just like a blunt axe will take much longer to fell a tree, a sub standard Verification IP will prolong your IP Development. On the other hand if you “sharpen your axe” i.e. develop/buy a better Verification solution, it may initially seem like its taking longer and others are getting ahead. But, in the long run you will develop your IP faster.
In this blog, we take a deeper look at this much contemplated VIP “switching cost”.
Related Semiconductor IP
- eDP 2.0 Verification IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- LLM AI IP Core
- Post-Quantum Digital Signature IP Core
- Compact Embedded RISC-V Processor
Related Blogs
- Why Aerospace Semiconductor Designers Are Taking a Page from Their Automotive Friends
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
- 3 Reasons Why Verification Engineers should use Python instead of Perl
- Encryption: Why Backdoors Are a Bad Idea
Latest Blogs
- Enhancing PCIe6.0 Performance: Flit Sequence Numbers and Selective NAK Explained
- Smarter ASICs and SoCs: Unlocking Real-World Connectivity with eFPGA and Data Converters
- RISC-V Takes First Step Toward International Standardization as ISO/IEC JTC1 Grants PAS Submitter Status
- Running Optimized PyTorch Models on Cadence DSPs with ExecuTorch
- PCIe 6.x: Synopsys IP Selected as First Gold System for Compliance Testing