Memory Controller IP, battle field where Cadence and Synopsys are really fighting face to face. Today let's have a look at Cadence’s strategy
January 13, 2012
I have shared with you last year some strategic information released by Cadence in April about their IP strategy, more specifically about the launch of the DDR4 Controller IP. And try to understand Cadence strategy about Interface IP in general (USB, PCIe, SATA, DDRn, HDMI, MIPI…) and how Cadence is positioned in respect with their closest and more successful competitor in this field, Synopsys.
Related Semiconductor IP
- AES GCM IP Core
- High Speed Ethernet Quad 10G to 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet Gen-2 Quad 100G PCS IP
- High Speed Ethernet 4/2/1-Lane 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet 2/4/8-Lane 200G/400G PCS
Related Blogs
- Buying DDRn Controller IP AND Memory Model to the same IP vendor gives real TTM advantage
- Why do I need an AMBA 5 CHI Memory Controller?
- PCIe 5.0 Controller IP on FPGAs: Current and Future Use Cases
- Rambus Achieves PCI Express® (PCIe®) 5.0 Compliance for PCIe 5.0 Controller IP and Inspector PCIe 5.0 Interposer with Diagnostic IP
Latest Blogs
- Why Choose Hard IP for Embedded FPGA in Aerospace and Defense Applications
- Migrating the CPU IP Development from MIPS to RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture
- Quintauris: Accelerating RISC-V Innovation for next-gen Hardware
- Say Goodbye to Limits and Hello to Freedom of Scalability in the MIPS P8700
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?