Arm M&A Nonsense
August 2, 2021
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Root of Trust (RoT)
- Fixed Point Doppler Channel IP core
- Multi-protocol wireless plaform integrating Bluetooth Dual Mode, IEEE 802.15.4 (for Thread, Zigbee and Matter)
- Polyphase Video Scaler
- Compact, low-power, 8bit ADC on GF 22nm FDX
Related Blogs
- Forte's acquisition of Arithmatica could open a new style for datapath design
- ARM's acquisition nightmare
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Announces Industry's First Verification IP for Embedded USB2v2 (eUSB2v2)
- The Industry’s First USB4 Device IP Certification Will Speed Innovation and Edge AI Enablement
- Understanding Extended Metadata in CXL 3.1: What It Means for Your Systems
- 2025 Outlook with Mahesh Tirupattur of Analog Bits
- eUSB2 Version 2 with 4.8Gbps and the Use Cases: A Comprehensive Overview