Arm M&A Nonsense
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- SPI Controller IP- Slave-only, Parameterized FIFO, AMBA APB / AHB / AXI Bus
- I2C Controller IP – Slave, Parameterized FIFO, Avalon Bus
- I2C Controller IP – Master, Parameterized FIFO, Avalon Bus
- I2C/SMBus Controller IP – Master / Slave, Parameterized FIFO, AXI/AHB/APB/Avalon Buses, SMBus Protocol
- I2C Controller IP- Master / Slave, Parameterized FIFO, Avalon Bus
Related Blogs
- Forte's acquisition of Arithmatica could open a new style for datapath design
- ARM's acquisition nightmare
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom