Arm M&A Nonsense
August 2, 2021
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flexible Pixel Processor Video IP
- Bluetooth Low Energy 6.0 Digital IP
- MIPI SWI3S Manager Core IP
- Ultra-low power high dynamic range image sensor
- Neural Video Processor IP
Related Blogs
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom
- What changes to expect in Verification IP landscape after Synopsys acquisition of nSys?
- Broadcom's Bet the Company Acquisition of Netlogic
Latest Blogs
- Breaking the Silence: What Is SoundWire‑I3S and Why It Matters
- What It Will Take to Build a Resilient Automotive Compute Ecosystem
- The Blind Spot of Semiconductor IP Sales
- Scalable I/O Virtualization: A Deep Dive into PCIe’s Next Gen Virtualization
- UEC-LLR: The Future of Loss Recovery in Ethernet for AI and HPC