Arm M&A Nonsense
August 2, 2021
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Rad-Hard GPIO, ODIO & LVDS in SkyWater 90nm
- 1.22V/1uA Reference voltage and current source
- 1.2V SLVS Transceiver in UMC 110nm
- Neuromorphic Processor IP
- Lossless & Lossy Frame Compression IP
Related Blogs
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom
- What changes to expect in Verification IP landscape after Synopsys acquisition of nSys?
- Broadcom's Bet the Company Acquisition of Netlogic
Latest Blogs
- MIPS P8700 RISC-V Processor for Advanced Functional Safety Systems
- Boost SoC Flexibility: 4 Design Tips for Memory Subsystems with Combo DDR3/4 Interfaces
- High Bandwidth Memory Evolution from First Generation HBM to the Latest HBM4
- Keeping Pace with CXL Specification Revisions
- Silicon-proven LVTS for 2nm: a new era of accuracy and integration in thermal monitoring