Arm M&A Nonsense
August 2, 2021
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- NPU IP Core for Mobile
- NPU IP Core for Edge
- Specialized Video Processing NPU IP
- HYPERBUS™ Memory Controller
- AV1 Video Encoder IP
Related Blogs
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom
- What changes to expect in Verification IP landscape after Synopsys acquisition of nSys?
- Broadcom's Bet the Company Acquisition of Netlogic
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Extends Support for Automotive Solutions on Arm Zena Compute Subsystems
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
- Time-of-Flight Decoding with Tensilica Vision DSPs - AI's Role in ToF Decoding
- Synopsys Expands Collaboration with Arm to Accelerate the Automotive Industry’s Transformation to Software-Defined Vehicles
- Deep Robotics and Arm Power the Future of Autonomous Mobility