Arm M&A Nonsense
August 2, 2021
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Flash Memory LDPC Decoder IP Core
- SLM Signal Integrity Monitor
- All Digital Fractional-N RF Frequency Synthesizer PLL in GlobalFoundries 22FDX
- USB 4.0 V2 PHY - 4TX/2RX, TSMC N3P , North/South Poly Orientation
- TSMC CLN5FF GUCIe LP Die-to-Die PHY
Related Blogs
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom
- What changes to expect in Verification IP landscape after Synopsys acquisition of nSys?
- Broadcom's Bet the Company Acquisition of Netlogic
Latest Blogs
- MIPI: Powering the Future of Connected Devices
- ESD Protection for an High Voltage Tolerant Driver Circuit in 4nm FinFET Technology
- Designing the AI Factories: Unlocking Innovation with Intelligent IP
- Smarter SoC Design for Agile Teams and Tight Deadlines
- Automotive Reckoning: Industry Leaders Discuss the Race to Redefine Car Development