Arm M&A Nonsense
August 2, 2021
A lot of nonsense is being talked about the Nvidia bid for Arm.
It revolves around whether an IPO would be better for Arm than being bought by Nvidia.
Everyone involved seems to agree that Arm’s open licensing model, with all customers being treated equally, should be preserved.
Which of the two options of either an independent Arm after an IPO or an Arm owned by one of its customers would be more likely to preserve the open licence model?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- NFC wireless interface supporting ISO14443 A and B with EEPROM on SMIC 180nm
- DDR5 MRDIMM PHY and Controller
- RVA23, Multi-cluster, Hypervisor and Android
- HBM4E PHY and controller
- LZ4/Snappy Data Compressor
Related Blogs
- Benefits Of Artisan Acquisition 'Coming Through', Says ARM CEO
- Percello’s acquisition by Broadcom
- What changes to expect in Verification IP landscape after Synopsys acquisition of nSys?
- Broadcom's Bet the Company Acquisition of Netlogic
Latest Blogs
- lowRISC Tackles Post-Quantum Cryptography Challenges through Research Collaborations
- How to Solve the Size, Weight, Power and Cooling Challenge in Radar & Radio Frequency Modulation Classification
- Programmable Hardware Delivers 10,000X Improvement in Verification Speed over Software for Forward Error Correction
- The Integrated Design Challenge: Developing Chip, Software, and System in Unison
- Introducing Mi-V RV32 v4.0 Soft Processor: Enhanced RISC-V Power