IP growth strategies
All companies want and need to grow. ARM is no different, and the same is true for ARC, Virage, MIPS, Tensilica, Synopsys, IPextreme, Intel and many others. Obviously, opinions on strategy differ immensely. The recent acquisition offer for ARC by Virage has left me a bit confused (as you may suspect, ARC was widely shopped around) as well as pleased to see another type of MIPS/Chipidea cycle starting. Perhaps Synopsys DesignWare will provide a more sucessful home for Chipidea. At the same time, who will MIPS next align with in physical IP now that Virage is a competitor? I suspect no other than my friends at Dolphin. ARM has been challenged by its acquisition of Artisan (perhaps a more appropriate analogy with Virage+ARC), which I will touch upon in subsequent posts. The path forward in the semiconductor IP space is certainly non-obvious.
Related Semiconductor IP
- RISC-V CPU IP
- AES GCM IP Core
- High Speed Ethernet Quad 10G to 100G PCS
- High Speed Ethernet Gen-2 Quad 100G PCS IP
- High Speed Ethernet 4/2/1-Lane 100G PCS
Related Blogs
- Design IP Sales Grew 16.7% in 2020, Best Growth Rate Ever!
- IPnest Forecast Interface IP Category Growth to $2.5B in 2025
- Interface IP in 2021: $1.3B, 22% growth and $3B in 2026
- Interface IP in 2022: 22% YoY growth still data-centric driven
Latest Blogs
- Why Choose Hard IP for Embedded FPGA in Aerospace and Defense Applications
- Migrating the CPU IP Development from MIPS to RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture
- Quintauris: Accelerating RISC-V Innovation for next-gen Hardware
- Say Goodbye to Limits and Hello to Freedom of Scalability in the MIPS P8700
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?