Apple vs Qualcomm: Who Extorted Whom?
Apple would have gone with WiMAX, if Qualcomm hadn't agreed to pay to Apple
Junko Yoshida, EETimes
9/6/2017 00:01 AM EDT
MADISON, Wis. — A dispute that has now escalated into an epic legal battle between technology juggernauts, Apple and Qualcomm, is complex and multi-layered, its facets all loosely connected and geographically sprawling.
The simple narrative, told by Apple, is that Qualcomm has illegally maintained a monopoly over the semiconductors used in cellphones.
The U.S. Fair Trade Commission (FTC) has argued that Qualcomm customers "accept elevated patent royalties they otherwise would refuse" because they’re forced "to negotiate in the shadow of Qualcomm's threat to withhold chips." As a result, "Qualcomm collects far more in royalties than other licensors in the industry with comparable patent portfolios."
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O library with ODIO and 5V HPD in TSMC 16nm
- 1.8V/3.3V I/O Library with ODIO and 5V HPD in TSMC 12nm
- 1.8V to 5V GPIO, 1.8V to 5V Analog in TSMC 180nm BCD
- 1.8V/3.3V GPIO Library with HDMI, Aanlog & LVDS Cells in TSMC 22nm
- Specialed 20V Analog I/O in TSMC 55nm
Related News
- Qualcomm Returns Fire in Apple Suit
- Qualcomm Files Answer and Counterclaims to Apple Lawsuit
- Apple Stops Royalties to Qualcomm
- Apple, Qualcomm in Fatal Attraction
Latest News
- Will RISC-V reduce auto MCU’s future risk?
- Frontgrade Gaisler Launches New GRAIN Line and Wins SNSA Contract to Commercialize First Energy-Efficient Neuromorphic AI for Space Applications
- Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution (CV-QKD) system demonstration
- Latest intoPIX JPEG XS Codec Powers FOR-A’s FA-1616 for Efficient IP Production at NAB 2025
- VeriSilicon Launches ISP9000: The Next-Generation AI-Embedded ISP for Intelligent Vision Applications