Apple vs Qualcomm: Who Extorted Whom?
Apple would have gone with WiMAX, if Qualcomm hadn't agreed to pay to Apple
Junko Yoshida, EETimes
9/6/2017 00:01 AM EDT
MADISON, Wis. — A dispute that has now escalated into an epic legal battle between technology juggernauts, Apple and Qualcomm, is complex and multi-layered, its facets all loosely connected and geographically sprawling.
The simple narrative, told by Apple, is that Qualcomm has illegally maintained a monopoly over the semiconductors used in cellphones.
The U.S. Fair Trade Commission (FTC) has argued that Qualcomm customers "accept elevated patent royalties they otherwise would refuse" because they’re forced "to negotiate in the shadow of Qualcomm's threat to withhold chips." As a result, "Qualcomm collects far more in royalties than other licensors in the industry with comparable patent portfolios."
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UCIe Chiplet PHY & Controller
- MIPI D-PHY1.2 CSI/DSI TX and RX
- Low-Power ISP
- eMMC/SD/SDIO Combo IP
- DP/eDP
Related News
- Qualcomm Returns Fire in Apple Suit
- Qualcomm Files Answer and Counterclaims to Apple Lawsuit
- Apple Stops Royalties to Qualcomm
- Apple, Qualcomm in Fatal Attraction
Latest News
- Frontgrade Gaisler and wolfSSL Collaborate to Enhance Cybersecurity in Space Applications
- Digital Core Design Unveils DPSI5 - The Next-Generation IP Core for PSI5 Communication
- Matrox Video and intoPIX Expand Interoperable IPMX & ST 2110 Solutions with JPEG XS Innovation at NAB 2025
- HCLTech joins Samsung Advanced Foundry Ecosystem as a Design Solution Partner
- TeraSignal to Showcase Retimer-Less PCIe 6.0 over Optics Featuring Synopsys IP at OFC 2025