苹果与高通:谁解雇谁?
Apple would have gone with WiMAX, if Qualcomm hadn't agreed to pay to Apple
Junko Yoshida, EETimes
9/6/2017 00:01 AM EDT
MADISON, Wis. — A dispute that has now escalated into an epic legal battle between technology juggernauts, Apple and Qualcomm, is complex and multi-layered, its facets all loosely connected and geographically sprawling.
The simple narrative, told by Apple, is that Qualcomm has illegally maintained a monopoly over the semiconductors used in cellphones.
The U.S. Fair Trade Commission (FTC) has argued that Qualcomm customers "accept elevated patent royalties they otherwise would refuse" because they’re forced "to negotiate in the shadow of Qualcomm's threat to withhold chips." As a result, "Qualcomm collects far more in royalties than other licensors in the industry with comparable patent portfolios."
Related Semiconductor IP
- JESD204D Transmitter and Receiver IP
- 100G UDP IP Stack
- Frequency Synthesizer
- Temperature Sensor IP
- LVDS Driver/Buffer
Related News
- 高通与贵州省签署战略合作协议,并组建合资企业以在中国研发和销售服务器芯片
- 台积电预计锁定苹果A10,A11订单
- 高通公布世界首款10nm服务器商用样片,重塑数据中心计算的未来格局
- Rambus在CES的高通展台展示物联网安全技术