Viewpoint: RTL-ers should move to ESL
Tom Sandoval, Calypto Design Systems
(10/19/2007 2:15 PM EDT) -- EE Times
Fifteen years ago, designers were buzzing about a new design approach: Register Transfer Level (RTL) Design. There was a fundamental change underway in how chip designs were created and implemented. There were methodology experts within electronics companies whose sole responsibility was to move design teams to using RTL design methods. It was this focus that enabled the methodology shift the industry experienced and changed the way chips were designed.
Back then, the average chip had tens of thousands of gates and took 18 to 24 months to design. Fast forward to 2007 and, while the average gate count is now in the tens of millions, design cycle requirements have been slashed to six to nine months. Still, the majority of U.S. design teams are using a design methodology similar to what was used in the 1990s.
While RTL design was and still is an important engineering methodology development, new technologies and standards are forcing continued evolution. But, what happened to our methodology experts?
(10/19/2007 2:15 PM EDT) -- EE Times
Fifteen years ago, designers were buzzing about a new design approach: Register Transfer Level (RTL) Design. There was a fundamental change underway in how chip designs were created and implemented. There were methodology experts within electronics companies whose sole responsibility was to move design teams to using RTL design methods. It was this focus that enabled the methodology shift the industry experienced and changed the way chips were designed.
Back then, the average chip had tens of thousands of gates and took 18 to 24 months to design. Fast forward to 2007 and, while the average gate count is now in the tens of millions, design cycle requirements have been slashed to six to nine months. Still, the majority of U.S. design teams are using a design methodology similar to what was used in the 1990s.
While RTL design was and still is an important engineering methodology development, new technologies and standards are forcing continued evolution. But, what happened to our methodology experts?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Articles
- Viewpoint: Need to move beyond the network-on-chip
- State of RTL based design - is it time to move beyond?
- Certifying RISC-V: Industry Moves to Achieve RISC-V Core Quality
- Amba bus may move MIPS into ARM territory
Latest Articles
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience
- ZTA-Q: an Open-source RISC-V Platform for Accurate Quantized CNN Inference
- Automated Pre-Silicon Verification of High-Speed DDR5 and LPDDR5/6 Memory Controllers: Closed-Loop Timing, Mode Register, and PHY Synchronization in UVM
- U-Sonic: An Open-Source 8-Channel Ultrasound Transmit IP in a 130 nm RISC-V SoC
- S-ALSA: Co-Design of Adiabatic Logic-based Sensing and Balanced Bit-Cells for Secure and Energy-Efficient MRAM