How to achieve timing-closure in high-end FPGAs
By Angela Sutton and Jeff Garrison, Synplicity
January 23, 2008 -- pldesignline.com
Using graph-based physical synthesis to achieve timing closure in high-capacity, high-performance FPGAs.
Introduction
Timing-closure is a growing concern for FPGA designers, particularly with the recent introduction of multi-million gate architectures fabricated at the 90 nm and 65 nm technology nodes. It is not sufficient for a timing-closure solution – the entire flow, including synthesis – to meet only the required timing; such a solution must also minimize the number of time-consuming synthesis-place-route iterations and provide results that remain stable across multiple physical synthesis runs and during final routing.
The designers' end goal is to ensure that timing will be met at the end of the FPGA design flow and to implement and debug the FPGA system as quickly and as soon as possible, possibly with the need to incorporate design changes and spec modifications along the way.
Placement and availability of routing resources play a huge role in the designers' ability to meet eventual performance goals in their FPGA implementation. Simultaneous logic synthesis and physical placement optimizations allow designers to rapidly drive towards – and concurrently lock-down – timing performance in their FPGA. The performance is more readily ensured when the synthesis tool passes legalized placement information to the FPGA vendor's back-end tools.
January 23, 2008 -- pldesignline.com
Using graph-based physical synthesis to achieve timing closure in high-capacity, high-performance FPGAs.
Introduction
Timing-closure is a growing concern for FPGA designers, particularly with the recent introduction of multi-million gate architectures fabricated at the 90 nm and 65 nm technology nodes. It is not sufficient for a timing-closure solution – the entire flow, including synthesis – to meet only the required timing; such a solution must also minimize the number of time-consuming synthesis-place-route iterations and provide results that remain stable across multiple physical synthesis runs and during final routing.
The designers' end goal is to ensure that timing will be met at the end of the FPGA design flow and to implement and debug the FPGA system as quickly and as soon as possible, possibly with the need to incorporate design changes and spec modifications along the way.
Placement and availability of routing resources play a huge role in the designers' ability to meet eventual performance goals in their FPGA implementation. Simultaneous logic synthesis and physical placement optimizations allow designers to rapidly drive towards – and concurrently lock-down – timing performance in their FPGA. The performance is more readily ensured when the synthesis tool passes legalized placement information to the FPGA vendor's back-end tools.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Articles
- Timing Closure on FPGAs
- FPGA prototyping of complex SoCs: Partitioning and Timing Closure Challenges with Solutions
- Latches and timing closure: a mixed bag
- Deriving design margins for successful timing closure
Latest Articles
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience
- ZTA-Q: an Open-source RISC-V Platform for Accurate Quantized CNN Inference
- Automated Pre-Silicon Verification of High-Speed DDR5 and LPDDR5/6 Memory Controllers: Closed-Loop Timing, Mode Register, and PHY Synchronization in UVM
- U-Sonic: An Open-Source 8-Channel Ultrasound Transmit IP in a 130 nm RISC-V SoC
- S-ALSA: Co-Design of Adiabatic Logic-based Sensing and Balanced Bit-Cells for Secure and Energy-Efficient MRAM