In multicore SOC architectures, buses are a last resort
By Steve Leibson, Tensilica
EE Times (09/29/08, 12:01:00 AM EDT)
The one-processor system model that dominated electronic system design since 1971 is now thoroughly obsolete. Today's SOC designers readily accept the idea of using multiple processors in their complex systems to achieve design goals and use the terms "control plane" and "data plane" to describe how these various on-chip processors are used on the chip. These terms appeared during the Internet and networking boom. At first, they referred to the design of multiple-board networking systems but have now become universal and are suitable for describing many systems, such as audio- and video-encoding/decoding designs that must handle high-speed data and execute complex control algorithms. Processor I/O data rates are as important as computational performance in such systems.

EE Times (09/29/08, 12:01:00 AM EDT)
The one-processor system model that dominated electronic system design since 1971 is now thoroughly obsolete. Today's SOC designers readily accept the idea of using multiple processors in their complex systems to achieve design goals and use the terms "control plane" and "data plane" to describe how these various on-chip processors are used on the chip. These terms appeared during the Internet and networking boom. At first, they referred to the design of multiple-board networking systems but have now become universal and are suitable for describing many systems, such as audio- and video-encoding/decoding designs that must handle high-speed data and execute complex control algorithms. Processor I/O data rates are as important as computational performance in such systems.
The main processor bus is the sole data highway into and out of most processor cores. Because processors interact with other types of bus masters--including other processors and DMA controllers--and to support SOC architectures employing bus hierarchies, main processor buses feature sophisticated transaction protocols and arbitration mechanisms that enable such design complexity. These protocols and arbitration mechanisms usually require multi-cycle bus transactions that can slow system performance.

To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Articles
- PLL Subsystem architectures for SoC design
- Optimizing Communication and Data Sharing in Multi-Core SoC Designs
- A RISC-V Multicore and GPU SoC Platform with a Qualifiable Software Stack for Safety Critical Systems
- AIA: A 16nm Multicore SoC for Approximate Inference Acceleration Exploiting Non-normalized Knuth-Yao Sampling and Inter-Core Register Sharing
Latest Articles
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience
- ZTA-Q: an Open-source RISC-V Platform for Accurate Quantized CNN Inference
- Automated Pre-Silicon Verification of High-Speed DDR5 and LPDDR5/6 Memory Controllers: Closed-Loop Timing, Mode Register, and PHY Synchronization in UVM
- U-Sonic: An Open-Source 8-Channel Ultrasound Transmit IP in a 130 nm RISC-V SoC
- S-ALSA: Co-Design of Adiabatic Logic-based Sensing and Balanced Bit-Cells for Secure and Energy-Efficient MRAM