Using FPGAs for advanced collision avoidance systems
Martin Mason, Actel
(10/03/2007 12:15 PM EDT) -- EE Times
Electronic safety systems are now commonplace among automotive applications. In most countries, the law mandates restraint systems, such as air bags and seat and harness belts. Far from being an expensive afterthought, safety systems are, in many cases, now a primary selling feature of a vehicle or brand. Safety features take many forms, and new safety features are in fact increasingly concerned with driver assistance and awareness. Whereas airbags, which may save a life or minimize bodily harm in an accident or collision, have been in use for some time, a new generation of safety systems focuses on solutions designed to prevent collisions altogether. In fact, one of the most progressive areas of prophylactic system development and deployment is collision avoidance.
Currently in development are several main collision-avoidance systems for passenger-car applications grouped into either passive or active safety systems. Passive systems include driver-assisted solutions such as backup or side-looking blind-spot detection. Active systems, on the other hand, include, among other things, automatic-assisted braking systems. In short, the automobiles produced today are deploying the latest in safety technology features, both passive and active.
Automotive electronics designers are increasingly turning to nonvolatile, flash-based, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to meet their needs and replace the costly and complex application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) technologies that have traditionally been used. Until now, ASICs had to be leveraged because they represented the only way to get the low power, reliability and endurance needed for the most demanding automotive systems, such as under the hood and safety applications. These applications have stringent requirements for extended temperature tolerance, high reliability, firm-error immunity and low power, far exceeding the flexibility, low-cost and rapid time-to-market advantages required by in-cabin telematics and infotainment automotive applications.
Sophisticated automotive systems rely on logic for real-time decision-making related to passive and active systems. Firm-error immunity is fundamental to the logic used in these critical safety systems. In actuality, automotive design engineers have long sought an alternative to the lengthy development cycles of sometimes-risky MCU and ASIC solutions.
(10/03/2007 12:15 PM EDT) -- EE Times
Electronic safety systems are now commonplace among automotive applications. In most countries, the law mandates restraint systems, such as air bags and seat and harness belts. Far from being an expensive afterthought, safety systems are, in many cases, now a primary selling feature of a vehicle or brand. Safety features take many forms, and new safety features are in fact increasingly concerned with driver assistance and awareness. Whereas airbags, which may save a life or minimize bodily harm in an accident or collision, have been in use for some time, a new generation of safety systems focuses on solutions designed to prevent collisions altogether. In fact, one of the most progressive areas of prophylactic system development and deployment is collision avoidance.
Currently in development are several main collision-avoidance systems for passenger-car applications grouped into either passive or active safety systems. Passive systems include driver-assisted solutions such as backup or side-looking blind-spot detection. Active systems, on the other hand, include, among other things, automatic-assisted braking systems. In short, the automobiles produced today are deploying the latest in safety technology features, both passive and active.
Automotive electronics designers are increasingly turning to nonvolatile, flash-based, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to meet their needs and replace the costly and complex application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) technologies that have traditionally been used. Until now, ASICs had to be leveraged because they represented the only way to get the low power, reliability and endurance needed for the most demanding automotive systems, such as under the hood and safety applications. These applications have stringent requirements for extended temperature tolerance, high reliability, firm-error immunity and low power, far exceeding the flexibility, low-cost and rapid time-to-market advantages required by in-cabin telematics and infotainment automotive applications.
Sophisticated automotive systems rely on logic for real-time decision-making related to passive and active systems. Firm-error immunity is fundamental to the logic used in these critical safety systems. In actuality, automotive design engineers have long sought an alternative to the lengthy development cycles of sometimes-risky MCU and ASIC solutions.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Articles
- Using FPGAs to solve challenges in industrial applications
- Implementing digital processing for automotive radar using SoC FPGAs
- Achieving maximum motor efficiency using dual core ARM SoC FPGAs
- Using audio codecs IP as the digital audio hub in mobile multimedia systems
Latest Articles
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience
- ZTA-Q: an Open-source RISC-V Platform for Accurate Quantized CNN Inference
- Automated Pre-Silicon Verification of High-Speed DDR5 and LPDDR5/6 Memory Controllers: Closed-Loop Timing, Mode Register, and PHY Synchronization in UVM
- U-Sonic: An Open-Source 8-Channel Ultrasound Transmit IP in a 130 nm RISC-V SoC
- S-ALSA: Co-Design of Adiabatic Logic-based Sensing and Balanced Bit-Cells for Secure and Energy-Efficient MRAM