Power verification: trust but verify, or verify and trust?
Jerry Frenkil, Sequence Design
EE Times (07/13/2009 12:00 AM EDT)
The issue of verification has never been larger. Today, functional verification is at least as big a task as design and, in many cases, much larger. This has been the case for awhile now and the situation doesn't appear to be changing any time soon. If anything, verification is becoming an even larger and more difficult task.
It isn't hard to see why. More transistors and larger die sizes result in greater complexity. It is common today to see single chips with multiple CPUs and multiple memory systems, a DSP, and various interfaces such as USB, 802.11, and Bluetooth not to mention a healthy smattering of analog functions. And don't forget power management.
Accompanying all of the increased complexity is increased power consumption although, thanks to designer creativity, power consumption has not increased as rapidly as functional complexity. Various types of power reduction techniques have been employed to keep power concerns from derailing functional aspirations. After all, what good is a shiny new phone with video capabilities if the battery life is measured in minutes instead of hours or days?
EE Times (07/13/2009 12:00 AM EDT)
The issue of verification has never been larger. Today, functional verification is at least as big a task as design and, in many cases, much larger. This has been the case for awhile now and the situation doesn't appear to be changing any time soon. If anything, verification is becoming an even larger and more difficult task.
It isn't hard to see why. More transistors and larger die sizes result in greater complexity. It is common today to see single chips with multiple CPUs and multiple memory systems, a DSP, and various interfaces such as USB, 802.11, and Bluetooth not to mention a healthy smattering of analog functions. And don't forget power management.
Accompanying all of the increased complexity is increased power consumption although, thanks to designer creativity, power consumption has not increased as rapidly as functional complexity. Various types of power reduction techniques have been employed to keep power concerns from derailing functional aspirations. After all, what good is a shiny new phone with video capabilities if the battery life is measured in minutes instead of hours or days?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Articles
- Challenges and Benefits of Low Power Design Verification with CPF for a standalone IP
- Robust Low power Architecture verification Strategy
- Integrated Low Power Verification Suite: The way forward for SoC use-case Verification
- Power of UVM's Command Line Argument Usage in Verification Test benches
Latest Articles
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience
- ZTA-Q: an Open-source RISC-V Platform for Accurate Quantized CNN Inference
- Automated Pre-Silicon Verification of High-Speed DDR5 and LPDDR5/6 Memory Controllers: Closed-Loop Timing, Mode Register, and PHY Synchronization in UVM
- U-Sonic: An Open-Source 8-Channel Ultrasound Transmit IP in a 130 nm RISC-V SoC
- S-ALSA: Co-Design of Adiabatic Logic-based Sensing and Balanced Bit-Cells for Secure and Energy-Efficient MRAM