Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, SATA... the winners and losers in 2012
January 9, 2013
Who makes the decision and declare that a specific interface protocol is successful? Not me, as I can only consolidate market share data and some insight information coming from the industry. The end user, when going to a shop (real or virtual) and spend a significant part of his budget to buy an electronic product, selecting among hundreds, will eventually decide for the success of a certain feature (SuperSpeed USB, HDMI or ThunderBolt). But, if you wait for the success of this feature on the mainstream market to integrate it into your system (OEM), your SoC (chip maker) or your IP portfolio (EDA/IP vendor), then you are respectively 12/18 months, 2 years or more late…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB 3.0 PHY
- USB 3.0 SSIC Adapter
- USB4 v2.0 Verification IP
- USB 4.0 Verification IP
- Simulation VIP for PIPE PHY
Related Blogs
- Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, DDRn... the winner and losers in 2013
- Interface Protocols, USB3, HDMI, MIPI... the winner and losers in 2011
- According with Cadence, PCI Express gen-3, to be the PCIe solution for the mainstream market as soon as in 2012
- MIPI UniPro through eyes of PCI Express
Latest Blogs
- World's First Standards-Compliant 112G PHY IP for Linear Optics: A Turning Point for AI Interconnects
- One Key for Every Door: How Aliro Extends the UWB Digital Key Beyond the Car
- Reprogrammable Post-Quantum Security for SoCs: Why Crypto-Agility Matters
- Designing the Beam Steering Core for a C-Band AESA: A Look at VSI's VBF0644 GaAs Beamformer IC
- Secure Boot for embedded systems: Building a complete chain of trust