Interface Protocols, USB3, HDMI, MIPI... the winner and losers in 2011
Releasing a new protocol like ThunderBolt, HDMI or SuperSpeed USB has not only to do with bandwidth performance or form factor of the connector as a guarantee of success. Some non-scientific parameters also play a role in the alchemy, that’s why forecasting the success of a certain protocol is such a hard task, and can’t be reduced to a feature list comparison table. That’s why, even if good marketing campaign can help (in fact is a necessary condition), properly marketing a technically attractive protocol is not sufficient to make it successful in the mass market. Do I know the magic recipe to cook an interface protocol generating high penetration in the mass market? I would be rich if I knew it! But I can try, at least, to understand which protocols are the winners in 2011, demonstrating high market penetration (and becoming “de facto” standard in certain market segments), or fast growing penetration (which is even more useful if you want to grow your business, developing around this protocol). Then, if we can identify winners, some losers should exist as well…
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related Blogs
- Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, SATA... the winners and losers in 2012
- Interface Protocols, USB3, PCI Express, MIPI, DDRn... the winner and losers in 2013
- MIPI Protocols - Making Mobile Happen at MWC
- Interface IP Protocols: Status (2013), CAGR (2008/2013) & Forecast (to 2020)
Latest Blogs
- Beyond Trusted: What the NSA’s New Guidance Means for Hardware Security
- A scalable, shader-programmable vector graphics GPU core for low-power MCUs
- Navigating ISO 26262 Part 11: A Guide for Semiconductor Architects
- Embedded Security explained: Digital signatures
- Hardware security verification must go beyond functional testing